Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Recording HD? (Score 1) 536

1) DVR from cable company. Problems: I've gotten anecdotal information that these DVR's have poorly designed UI's and tend to be somewhat flaky (worse than Windows). Also, they are a closed system, I can't move the recording to a mobile device for portable viewing.

At least in my experience with Comcast DVRs, yes they are flaky, the interface is poor, the fast forwarding sucks, and it has had problems with just magically losing all recordings twice in the two years I used it.

2) PC + HD ATSC / Clear-QAM tuner card - this gives me the ability to record over the air broadcasts and cable channels that support Clear-QAM (which is a fairly small subset of cable channels).

Works well, although I'd recommend something like the HDHomerun (dual clear-QAM tuner box that plugs into your home network). At least where I am, I get pretty much everything on basic cable in 480p, and then the OTA channels plus a few others in either 720p or 1080i.

Beware that Comcast likes to leave their QAM frequencies undocumented and likes to map them to different channels periodically. So if you're using MythTV you'll want some familiarity with the database, particularly the channels and dtv_multiplex tables. That said, with the switchover to digital, I no longer have the ability to record analog cable and you may find the same problem in upcoming months. In particular, in my area, Comcast switched QAM frequencies last month (again) and is now using some of the area formerly allocated to analog.

3) PC + HD Tuner Card + Cable Card - does anyone make one of these? Anyone have any experience with this?

Tivo is your easiest solution. Windows Media Center will support a CableCard but with some tweaking required (good writeup here: http://hd.engadget.com/2009/05/12/how-to-install-a-cablecard-tuner-in-your-diy-media-center/)

I don't know of a way to get MythTV working with a cable card and it seems rather unlikely because it is a hardware / vendor lock-in.

Comment get a powerful machine (Score 1) 697

I'm not joking on this one. I have a quad Athlon 3.0ghz performing MythTV duties. It draws a lot of power when it needs to - for example, commercial flagging HD recordings. But I have it set up to conserve power when it's idle, which is most of the time. Two things you'll want to consider:

1) The easiest thing is to set up powernowd (simplest daemon IMO - but there are a couple alternatives). It drops the speed of your CPUs when they are idle - in my case from 3.0ghz down to 800Mhz. This reduces power usage, keeps your machine cooler and has zero impact on service availability.

2) Depending on what you use the machine for, you may want to set it up sleep most of the time. Then use wake on LAN, or ACPI / BIOS wakeup functionality so that it powers up on demand. The BIOS method is useful for things like MythTV that perform a lot of scheduled tasks.

Comment Re:Illusion (Score 2, Interesting) 352

But this also has the problem that trademark owners usually dont like showing their products in bad light and going even so far that the game is not allowed to break their cars and so on.

This is right on the money. Forza Motorsport 3 had to rely on a lot of Microsoft legal wrangling to get the car companies to even allow *limited* damage modelling in the game. The major auto manufacturers are VERY picky about how you can depict their vehicles. This applies to movies as well as racing games. Look at the blatant Audi product placement in Iron Man. I'm not talking about the R8 either. I'm talking about the family driving in their Audi towards the end of the movie in the last major fight scene. Thanks to our hero, and the excellent quality and performance of the car (gag) they get away unscathed even in the middle of the destruction and mayhem that's going on.

Comment Re:Too early yet (Score 1) 334

The taxpayer would get stuck with all of the unpaid hospital bills (right now the hospitals eat them or try to make up the cost on those who have credit and can pay).

To repeat the question: how is that different than what we have today? Let's go over how the taxpayer gets screwed by uninsured people, or worse yet, illegals - right now:

Right now uninsured people use the emergency room for care because they cannot be turned away. And yeah doctors or hospitals may eat the cost like you mentioned. It also makes things even worse than uninsured clinic visits because it forces ER docs triage extra people, making it more difficult to quickly get to the serious cases.

But let me then continue to a case in my old neighborhood where it got so bad that they finally just closed the ER(!). A large majority of the cases were uninsured gunshot victims due to gang activity in the area. The hospital, doctors, etc got fed up and shut down the ER. What happened then? Yeah you guessed it - those gunshot victims were *airlifted* to a hospital an hour away. How's that for use of taxpayer money?

Bottom line is that the docs and hospitals "eat" the cost but it eventually gets passed along to you and me in the form of higher insurance premiums and higher taxes. And the result is more expensive than the initial case would have been in the first place.

All in all, I have little respect for anyone who complains about health care overhaul and offers the status quo as reasonable or preferable. Leaving a large segment of the population out of the system in order to make it cost effective for the remainder is neither acceptable nor effective. It simply causes more problems like what I mentioned above.

/rant off

Comment Re:Comcast's version is orders of magitude better. (Score 1) 352

c: It does NOT get *.whatever, only www.*.(TLD), thus even when you don't opt out, it is at least limited to web-related typos. This is actually a big deal, as I think Comcast is the first one NOT to do it for everything.

In the quick test I did, the hijack occurred regardless of the "www" prefix being present.

Comment Re:Either you agree with copyrights or you don't (Score 1) 546

I own it, so now you know 1 person :) I wouldn't call it the greatest PC game of all time. It was more like reading a novel. But it was worthy of a purchase.

I don't know what their claimed piracy figures were on that game. However, I do know that PC games ALSO suffer from poor price controls and shelf life, compared with console games. Not to mention back when that game was released, there weren't CD keys, online registration and whatnot in place, which essentially block first sale privileges. That made it easy for people to return the game to the store and/or resell it when they found out it wasn't what they expected. And frankly, I don't think it had mass market appeal.

Slashdot Top Deals

Software production is assumed to be a line function, but it is run like a staff function. -- Paul Licker

Working...