Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re: Here's an offensive term (Score 1) 570

I was thinking of the SCSI controller and drives using the "master" and "slave" term, totally forgot about IDE. For scsi, they could use host and client for the terminology. For ide, have always primary to refer to the main drive and secondary for the second, as that particular technology only supported 2 devices per cable, unlike scsi with their 7 devices on one internal cable.

Comment Re: Like how DDR4 did and DDR3? (Score 1) 104

In the old days of PC's that used memory chips, if graphics memory was used on the mainboard instead of regular dram, the pc was very fast.

The introduction of the ram drive helped those old PC's performance versus the hard drive but the cost was quite steep.

These days, solid state drives helped to speed up PC's running all these huge code line software. The addition of using ddr5 (graphics memory) makes me wonder why it took so long to figure that out.

Comment Re: They haven't been right about anything ever (Score 1) 122

I suspect that with the climate warming up as it is, deadly pathogens will appear quicker than the past "every few decades" - I recall a talk I had with a tropical disease doctor in 1990 about this very issue. Environmental warming and human activities in tropical areas would bring about plagues humanity hasn't seen in centuries. And with so many people living in close quarters (cities) it would be a disaster.

Comment A debate on freedom of speech? (Score 1) 335

"Freedom of speech does not permit someone to make a false statement about another person that could damage his or her reputation. This applies to the spoken word, which is called slander, as well as libel, which is defamation in print." [https://www.brighthubeducation.com/social-studies-help/104990-limitations-on-american-freedom-of-speech/]

And from June 17, 2019:
"Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote on behalf of the majority that, while the First Amendment's free speech clause applies to "state actors" or governmental entities, the network is a private entity, not a state actor: "Providing some kind of forum for speech is not an activity that only governmental entities have traditionally performed," the decision reads. "Therefore, a private entity who provides a forum for speech is not transformed by that fact alone into a state actor." "
[https://psmag.com/news/a-supreme-courts-decision-could-have-implications-for-social-media-free-speech]

I wondered last June (2019) if someone on a social media site would ignite this debate, should have known.

Slashdot Top Deals

"No matter where you go, there you are..." -- Buckaroo Banzai

Working...