Comment Re:Chicago Blackhawks too? (Score 1) 646
if "redskins" is denied a trademark due to some people finding it offensive, how did N.W.A. (Niggaz Wit Attitudes) ever get a theirs? the N-word has always had negative connotations, no one can claim that it wasnt a hot-button word when N.W.A. was new. its sad that the govt is again passive-agressively strong-arming, i wonder if harry reid or other outspoken idiots were behind this.
i've never heard someone call a native american "redskin" before. it's always been in reference to the football team.
i have however, heard the term "chief" used disparagingly. why are the kansas city chiefs not also on the hook?
the overall question i have is, how can we more effectively sanitize the world to no longer offend anyone at all? handling these case-by-case is stupidly inefficient.
i've never heard someone call a native american "redskin" before. it's always been in reference to the football team.
i have however, heard the term "chief" used disparagingly. why are the kansas city chiefs not also on the hook?
the overall question i have is, how can we more effectively sanitize the world to no longer offend anyone at all? handling these case-by-case is stupidly inefficient.