Exactly. The same kind of people still have AOL accounts... heck I know one or two MSN customers too. These "portals" are the Internet to them. Luckily for Y!/AOL their remaining customers are plentiful and don't know how to block ads.
"Generally, the smarter a person gets, the more republican they tend to lean in ideology even if they insist on remaining democrats or liberals."
I truly hope you are trolling and don't believe what you wrote. I have read some idiotic stuff on
It is more like: "Generally, the older a person gets the more conservative they tend to lean..." The older you get the more you have thus you have more to lose. I tend to think it is more like "Generally, the more intelligent a person gets the more centrist they tend to lean..." Key being intelligence (contextual application of data) vs smart (memorization of data) and realizing that voters are a diverse group with diverse wants, needs, etc etc so there is rarely a single right answer to complex issues.
Having said that, thinking of politicians as "democrat" or "republican" is a trap. If you pay attention you will see they are more alike than they are different. I tend to think of them as two different marketing campaigns for the same organization.
No no no that would never happen. I'm sure the plan would be to redirect it to circle on itself so it gets dizzy and falls down
This may make me sound old but before Google was around the Internet was much much smaller and search engines pretty much SUCKED. Searching was (and sometimes still is) a skill/art. Sure search engines and directories got incrementally better at first and then Google blew them all out of the water.
Feel free to use another search site. Nobody is forcing you to use Google.
You just don't get it. They need to keep the wealthy folks going so they can employ the poor. If we run out of rich employers we will all be out of work.
Only for the shares we purchased. Unfortunately we the taxpayers were never asked about the purchase or the sale.
He represents the company and his job is to protect shareholder value.
Hmm. I think you may have illustrated a point.
He is technically right and morally wrong.
Let the shareholders decide by vote. We the consumers (and the taxpayers) can then decide if we want to continue to buy their products, bail them out, or invest as shareholders. This is a decision that will have very long term effects on GM that will affect them long after the CEO is gone. I know it will affect my future buying decisions.
Spammers still do the 1px thing? Who downloads images by default?
I am no Apple fan but I tend to agree just for the fact that he can take it to the store and get help if/when you are not around.
Unless you have a very large library in various formats. iTunes for me is one of the worst applications I have ever battled with and I doubt they will ever make it suitable for folks like that me that feel Foobar 2000 is a great app.
Uh, I think you have that backwards.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/talent
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/skill
We don't see power companies charging me more for using particular devices. Is it because they can't tell or because the service should be usage agnostic?
In the end the customer pays so they will just pay twice. First to the ISP and then second to the content provider who's costs go up because they have to pay ISPs not to cripple their traffic. If they go through with this extortion then monthly rates for Netflix, Hulu, etc will be pushed up.
I agree the specs were probably horrible but they should have not taken the money if they couldn't do it. Unfortunately that is not how the big IT industry works.
It sure seems like someone is always willing to make a mountain out of mole hill when it comes to Tesla. I know this kind of stuff comes along with success but at some point I have to wonder if there is some big money (oil or auto) behind this stuff.
Say "twenty-three-skiddoo" to logout.
