Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Off the top of my head (Score 1) 694

How about instead of an increased minimum wage, we abolish it and provide a minimum income for people. At that point employers lose the upper hand in forcing people to take low wages to survive and instead they have to compete with pay and benefits people think fit the job.

Of course there are issues with funding that (higher taxes on the rich would work best) and it would work better on a sliding scale so people that do work get more money, it doesn't just get taken out of their minimum

Comment Re:And... it's gone (Score 2) 636

Immediate life saving help costs a whole lot more than preventative health care. It's the unfunded emergency care that makes health care cost so much for the paying customers - they've got to recoup that money from somewhere. Seems a bit contradictory that eating a lot is a pre-existing condition, but smoking a lot is not.

I'm sure you're a healthy person that rejects health insurance, but some day you're going to be sick and want the help from insurance. Health insurance only works if you have it all the time, not just when you're sick. Pretty much everyone is going to need serious medical care at some point, so it's logical that they should get it now.

The socialist countries (even the ones with crippling austerity measures) survive with their health care and are MUCH healthier than Americans.

Do you really think the old system with tens of millions of people without access to health care was the BEST one? Been a bit short on other ideas...

Comment Re:And... it's gone (Score 4, Insightful) 636

There's always going to be the extreme libertarian view that Government should be abolished and everyone should fend for themselves, but countries with GOOD governments tend to be much better than countries with little or bad governments. Now I'm not saying the US has the best government, but it's not a bad one (despite some bad things it does) and it won't help to cut it down so it just functions less efficiently.

The mess of the health care act was because of the TeaParty/GOP/libertarians that are actually in favor of millions of people dying as a legitimate solution. It may sound crazy - because it is. Pretty much all other developed countries manage to provide health care to their citizens, but in the US we're worried about "death panels" killing off grandma and providing health care to women so we can't go there. ObamaCare was a first step - get everyone to have some sort of health care. A single payer would likely be more efficient than running through insurance companies, but that's too scary for some. We very much need more health care reform, but while some are offering solutions in reforms that will cover more people and bring down costs, others think the best solution is to drop tens of millions of people from the system and "scrap it". The system we had was fairly poor for those with money and horrible for those without - and costs were going up, yet people keep believing it's the American way that we should go back to. You can't make this stuff up, and you can't fix stupid.

Comment Re:Aren't they all? (Score 1) 348

This article immediately reminded me of the part of Snow Crash where the US Government monitors its employees reading the memos and disciplines them for taking too long or not long enough - and how the good employees will go back to reference earlier parts of the memo, etc.

Of course the employees were all basically gaming the system so they appeared to be doing it correctly.

Slashdot Top Deals

Without life, Biology itself would be impossible.

Working...