A wildcard domain cert starts at two hundred bucks.
Woe betide you if you host webmail and the like for friends etc, and you need multi-wildcard certs (last I checked, $2K a year for me vs $0 from LE).
I believe the current "head-up-ass" view of this is that you should just throw another few bucks to a CA every year, or get off the web. Maybe just give all your content to Farcebook, Gargle, Nanosoft etc, because why should us peons be allowed to put things on the web without what amounts to the modern version of royal assent? (It's usually couched in terms like "Well, how do you know your content wasn't altered by the time it got to the client" and "Your ISP is secretly recording everywhere you go and everything you do"). These concerns are not incorrect, but they can be
To be fair, there are cheap places to buy certificates - I was looking recently and found I could get one for about $30 for a normal site. But wildcards etc are still hundreds if you need more than one domain. Killing a free CA (who is delivering exactly what they say they will) isn't going to help.
To be fair this is because browsers like Chrome (swiftly followed by Edge and Firefox) have all decided that the search bar SHOULD act exactly like search. They removed the dedicated search box in favour of a "smart" unified typing place that in my experience, fails to select the correct thing to do about 50% of the time.
It's almost impossible to just type a hostname into the Complete Unified New Technology bar and consistently have the browser load the site (unless you hack Firefox options; I don't use Chrome so I don't know if it's possible at all and I can't see a way to make Edge be sane). No - a simple word MUST mean you're searching for something even if it's locally resolvable and not a word in any language. Thanks Google et al, making the world a worse place, one step at a time.
OK but then you have to have cross-checks that let people register/get certs for paypal-sucks.com without also permitting paypall.com, unless paypall.com is a legitimate business (PayPall being some payment processor in, I dunno, South Uzbekhistan). You also have to prevent getting wildcard certificates for anyone, because then they could set up paypal.com.golbalisecure.com (just by getting a wildcard for com.golbalisecure.com) - which would also let them get close to microsoft.com(.golbalisecure.com), google.com(.golbalisecure.com) etc.
This is not a problem easily solved with simple rules. And even THEN you get to the point of having hundreds or thousands of people employed to push yes/no buttons, which would surely not lead to underpaid, bored staff with bad KPIs/goals just repeatedly clicking Yes with no thought.
How did that help, again?
So let me see. Was it:
All the people pushing hard passwords and catchphrases should probably read this again. They're the top 5%-8% of the population. WE are the top 5%-8% of the population in this regard and we can't even get it right. What chance does your average tradie have - they may be experts and legends in their fields but in ICT they're
I can't wait for Windows Hello or something similar on phones (Samsung have something I think, windows phones did/do?) to get better and better so that people can have stupidly complex passwords in a safe and use their faces to unlock on a daily basis (it's one thing to sign you into a game console, it probably should be another level entirely to unlock the nucular (sic) launch codes).
Then let them do the same thing here - that's what they DO with locks, and locked safes, and safe-rooms, and vaults, and anything else "physically secured" in that way. Oh - you're saying this is a Lonsdaleite lined safe and you only have cream cheese with which to cut it open? Sorry, not my problem. I'm with others above - either you don't have evidence (and you're fishing) or you do have the evidence, in which case I think the phrase is "crap or get off the pot".
What a consignment of geriatric shoe manufacturers.
There's well over 200 if you search for IRC. Now if you're saying there's no good ones
Thing is if you do this and report it, you may be guilty of destroying evidence (even if it's unintentional and recoverable). I think the formal term is "spoliation", and burden of proof/consequences vary greatly.
Not a lawyer, though, so I'm probably wrong.
Imagine if your car had a non-removable battery, or even tires for that matter.
Geez, don't go giving the car manufacturers ideas!
The biggest problem with SO seems to be moderators stuffing around with the questions. "This is a bad question" (so I'm deleting it). "This belongs elsewhere" (so I'm deleting it). "I don't like the way you asked this question" (so I'm rewriting your 'how to do X' question to ask 'why is Y bad').
Thing is, people ask those questions in that way because it reflects how they think about the problem. Other people who think about it the same way won't be able to find an answer because the self-absorbed twits haven't figured out that if you asked a specific question, that's the one you need answered - not something random! As for deleting questions - FFS. Link to an existing one sure. But deleting questions doesn't help anyone.
Somewhat related: Curation sucks (SO, Yahoo Answers). Search is the answer.
As for the original question: Something is rotten somewhere. Ask a silly simple question you get slammed. Ask a detailed question with lots of information, no-one answers because it's too long or too hard.
So I can't buy something while on holiday in the US, and install on my PC at home in Australia? What if I buy something and move countries? What version do I buy if I live in Australia, travel to the US (and need to use the software there) and take a contract in the Ukraine? Region locks suck, may not be legally enforceable in some countries such as Australia - ACCC Copyright fact sheet used to say this about DVDs, emphasis mine:
An access control TPM specifically excludes TPMs which control geographic market segmentation. This means that consumers will be able to circumvent the region coding TPMs on legitimate DVDs purchased overseas. It also allows for the continued availability of region-free DVD players.
They also suck for users.
But then I guess that's the holy triumvirate, isn't it? Trying to force people to re-buy the same thing multiple times?
It's Google doing this. You just have do it Google's way because someone at Google arbitrarily decided it was the best thing to do for Google, regardless of existing standards, other environments or systems, or indeed the rest of the world breaking as a result.
Look at Gmail's implementation of addressing. Dots in the user portion of the address were significant in 1982 (RFC 822 / STD 11), but not for Google, who cannot differentiate Bob.Dole@ from BobDole@. Still. In twenty-freaking-sixteen.
It is much harder to find a job than to keep one.