Comment Unlikely. (Score 1) 325
Well, it's just a rumor. Apple is always surrounded by rumors and I don't think much of this one. Besides, all the limitations of Twitter make it seem like an u
Well, it's just a rumor. Apple is always surrounded by rumors and I don't think much of this one. Besides, all the limitations of Twitter make it seem like an u
What could possibly go wrong?
No, most Americans think the same thing. I don't think anyone at Fermilab or CERN thinks that way because it tends to be a lot of the same people. They're all physicists and they all want to run the experiments and get on with science.
They do want to get their names on papers & articles though.
You've clearly never tried to kill a zombie process.
Atlantis is right here.
It is true that some sectors will always need more power. It is not clear if those sectors are large enough to support the enormous and growing cost of each subsequent generation of CPU technology. Right now, scientific computation is essentially getting a subsidy from the gamer community. I don't know if this will continue to be true in the future. Game workloads currently do not benefit much from multicore designs and it is unlikely to be a "small matter of programming" to get there.
As specialized domains of computation become divergent in their needs, the goal of making one CPU design to rule them all gets harder and harder.
"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." -- Albert Einstein