Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Short answer: (Score 0) 686

They are using my compute resources and bandwidth to display content that is offensive to me.

May I ask you why do you visit these offensive ad-supported web sites? Is there something which forces you enter their URL into your browser? Are there armed thugs in your house sent by these disgusting sites? Do you hear voices in your head urging you to suffer?

By the way, I see that you are regularly using Slashdot. Have you bought a Slashdot subscription to not get advertisements? Or do you use an ad-blocker, which is free after all, and the Slashdot employees are gladly work for free for your entertainment anyway? Maybe you can add a third candidate for being a parasite to your analysis.

Comment Re:Dear ad-blocker (Score 3, Informative) 686

No, I am a software developer from the EU, who happens to work on a somewhat popular web site, and I value both my work and the work of other people who create content which proves to be useful or at least entertaining for me. This is the reason for example why I never click on the disable ads checkbox here on Slashdot, buy all the games are rarely play nowdays, etc.

Comment Re:Dear ad-blocker (Score 1, Funny) 686

You've turned highways roadsides into billboard plastered eyesores.

In many contries highway ads are banned.

You steal 15-22 minutes of every hour to sell us crap

I do not remember that I broke into your house armed with guns and forced you to view advertisements. For example the only TV channel I occassionally view is HBO, I pay the subscription fee, and do not view any ads.

You fill our snail mail boxes and email boxes with spam

No respectable company use spam nowdays.

In short, Go Fuck Yourself.

I seriously consider your recommendation, because you seem to be a person who is very experienced in this subject, i.e. in fucking yourself.

Comment Re:pay or view ads or search for ad-free site (Score 1) 686

Yes, maybe a button is also required to be binding. The current notice banners introduced because of the EU cookie law are everything but invisible. I assume you haven't see any of them. They are displayed either on the top of the browser windows or at the bottom of the window, in a relatively large rectange in a vivid color. Actually I find them more annoying than any ads except maybe the wrongest.

Comment pay or view ads or search for ad-free site (Score 1) 686

Web sites should put a message rectangle - like the current idiotic EU cookie banner -, that says:
"You are licensed to continue using this web site, if either you view ads and do not use any ad blocker, or if you pay our modest subscription fee, which is 2 cent/day." It is even better if it is displayed by the advertising agency, so if a somebody regularly use an ad blocker and do not pay on many sites, than he accumulates enough dept that it worths pursuing him by some debt collection agencies.

Comment Re:Take all the recommendations you get here ... (Score 1) 259

it depends on how the scripting engine based on the back end works, and if it's injectable. I've seen code snippets for Java code handed back to the back end, with the code handed back being in the front end web page. An attack on that, even for a serialized object, is as simple as writing a transcoding proxy to substitute your serialized objects for the intended serialized objects, thereby compromising the back end JVM. I'd also point out that a shop running Java back ends is much more likely to also run Java front ends, and depend on the security model.

I develop web applications in Java as a full time job for about 12 years, but I have no idea what are you talking about. Serialization deals with object data, it does not save or retrieve code. And what kind of scripting engine do you talk about? There are scripting engines written in Java, but Java is not a scripting engine. Of course everybody can write unsafe code in any language, but Java makes it hard. I never heard a single high profile exploited vulnerability in Java server side applications. There were serious vulnerabilities recently in the Java browser plugin and in sandboxing of downloaded applet code. It is quite sad that Oracle does not put more effort into securing the plugin. However, these issues has absolutely nothing to do with web applications, such as a forum.

Comment Re:shared FPU (Score 1) 133

Whether your metric is "performance per transistor" or "performance per mm^2 of chip area" or "performance per watt"

On the other hand AMD is quite good in "Performance per dollar".

Steamroller apparently only shares the MMX/FMAC unit, while standard floating point operations are per-core.

Uh, no. Steamroller retains the shared-FPU arrangement. In fact, you effectively said as much: "FMAC" operations are standard floating point operations. It doesn't get much more fundamental than multiplication and addition.

Standard floating point is already per-core even in Bulldozer. The shared 256 bit floating point unit can be split into two 128 bit unit. Standard floating point is less than 128 bits, so both cores perform these operations simultaneously.

The only case when one core of the unit waits for the other core to execute a standard floating point operation is when the other core is executing not a usual floating point operation, but a 256 bit AVX extended instruction. (MMX is only 128 bit).

Comment Re:Is this going to save AMD ? (Score 1) 133

the i3-2120 offers far better performance in the area's that count for business/enterprise users. The CPU has enough performance that even with the crappy Intel IGP, they still do what's needed quite well while offering a much lower TDP and even that's becoming important to everyone.

Do you talk about business desktops? They are idling all the time, you have to look at the idle power, not TDP.

Slashdot Top Deals

For God's sake, stop researching for a while and begin to think!

Working...