a) People also read about Ferraris, even though they'll never own one.

b) This sort of tech is what most people will be driving a few years from now.

Based on a sample size of two?

"Godwin"...

"Goodwin!" sounds like "good win!"

That's what he hopes people will think.

a) Everybody dumps their shares, share price plummets
b) He buys back his shares, dirt cheap.
c) RIM makes Apple-killing product announcement
d) Profit!!

Maybe for some ideal chemicals but gasoline engines are very inefficient (just look at how much cooling they need...)

Maybe in an American state with a high percentage of trailer trash, yes.

Down in Mexico (for example), not so much...

That's the way it works for some of them, yes...

Others? Not so much.

Airport radar systems can fail, too.

Maybe you'd better call them and express your concerns...

Radar is already secondary. Most information these days comes from GPS transponders on the aircraft, not radar. It's plotted on a radar screen but that's not where the info came from.

And program quality has dropped down to Anerican levels, yes. The relationbetween program quality and number of channels has again been proven to be inversely proportional.

Worse, the BBC is now in a deep financial crisis from having to fill up multiple channels instead of just two, quality ones.

It works for detecting stealth fighters over Iran, it should certainly work for non-stealth commercial aircraft.

What's a 'said'? What did it do?

It was a video game long before either of those two.

Which they will (all the virus has to do is promise them Britney Bewbs or whatever...)

Try google...