Seen him lately? He is a fat slob
http://datingismiserable.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/jen_playboy.jpg
NSFW.
I think one part of the test should include the probability that two independent parties doing the same work ending up with the exact same result should determine whether or not something should be a creative work.
Would two parties doing the exact same work come up with two [substantially] different models of the Washington monument? I doubt it.
If this test were applied, I think it becomes increasingly more obvious as to what is a creative work and what is not.
Admittedly I did not RTFA, but I'd assume that you can't just write, scribble, etc on these...
The majority of short life printouts that I use at work end up with notes, amendments and changes scribbled on them. It's a good system.
Unless I can do this on this new medium, I can't see it being useful in our offices.
Um... only F-16 in the current Air Force inventory is single engine... and it costs more to maintain than does F/A-18...
Yeah, yeah. What percentage of people in the sixties do you think called themselves hippies?
Being of that era, I have to call bullshit on a cheap meme. It's like blaming George Bush on the Greens on 20 years and about the same percentages.
The right to bear arms? Bring in the bears, I'll take five arms please!
Years later, when a publisher was trying to persuade him to make a longer Foundation work
This notion set off a massive warning bell in my head. Nothing could be worse than something once finished which gets re-written into something 8 times longer, or something written specifically for length in the first place. Exhibit one: Moby Dick. Exhibit two: much of Charles Dickens. If this is true you've probably convinced me to never read Foundation, or at least to track down the original short stories rather than trudge through a novelization of a short yet clearly complete, cerebral, and influential story.
Intel CPUs are not defective, they just act that way. -- Henry Spencer