When you posted that, was the reference not already in the summary? Because it is now, and it makes you look incredibly lame
I wasn't talking about moderations.
No, they have been telling the truth. They store a picture until the recipient opens it. They have to, how else could they send the picture to the recipient?
Gee, maybe they could encrypt it and just fucking send it?
Oh, right. Even something "simple" like PGP is beyond users at large. Shameful.
Who the fuck is Emmanual Assange?
You joke, but the first place I saw that happen was in GNOME. Personally I would prefer the application name to be central with the description subdued (basically reverse of how they have it in MATE, which is the limit of my current GNOME experience).
Whichever way it's done, I will say it's better than just the application name. Even better though, the files that govern what is displayed are easily (and very often are) internationalized. Eg, when you have your language set in English VLC might say "Media Player" but if you select Esperanto it might say "amaskomunikiloj ludanto" or whatever (google translate, there) - meanwhile "VLC" means nothing to someone who doesn't already know what it does.
Sorry, "used to be a big fan" implied to me that you were opposed to it's continuance.
Although I used to be a big fan of the work, I'm pretty sure I'll never see a commercial reactor born of the ITER project in my lifetime.
That's no reason to abandon it.
Have you been under a rock for the last 30 years? The only place it seems funding hasn't been slashed is pork and Defense.
Don't you have anything useful to say, ever? Your comment history suggests otherwise.
We probably would have it already if not for (deserved or not) proliferation paranoia and NIMBYs.
Welcome to the command line, where you have to actually know something about the system to use it. The GUIs don't have this problem so much as the menus are categorized and they usually have a "what this does" kind of field with them. Eg, GIMP shows as "Image Editor" with the actual name in de-emphasized styling.
Yes. Looks similar (in my mind at least) to the Soyuz.
They did a very good job with the sound, definitly gotta give them credit with that - everything from the lack of sounds for things you typically see presented with sound, to the sounds transduced through the suit (eg listen closely while they are working on the Hubble in the beginning).
I was also impressed with the little spurting noises from the maneuvering thrusters on the (Russian vehicle and the Chinese copy that I just for some reason cannot name at the moment).
For God's sake, stop researching for a while and begin to think!
