You have a very good point. You should tell that to people like Patricia Williams, Ibeam X. Kendi, Cheryl Harris, and quite a few others.
BTW, seeing how you so aptly pretend to understand the entire literature and movement that makes up critical race theory from a couple lines in an encyclopedia entry, can you elaborate and give us your insights on whiteness as property, the concept that whites have been the recipient of civil rights legislation, and perhaps the traits of whiteness and how whiteness traits like "time" itself is racist. And while you are at it, please lecture us on how this proves institution discrimination. Feel free to delve into the many other aspects as they do nothing but sure up the conclusions a rational person would draw from the previous.
A problem you are going to quickly run into is that your highlighted little point of reference is quickly abandoned as you understand it and most everything is presented in terms of how white people are and how that whiteness gives them an advantage. Kendi even goes as far as claiming whiteness is inherently advantageous in society, the the only cure for this discrimination is more discrimination and the only remedy for that is future discrimination.
So yes, while you have a point in isolation, it is no sharper of a point than somebody sticking their finger out to sway another person's attention. You could say it is a complete distraction. When you dig into the meat behind crt, you see a completely different picture than what you want to describe from the surface. My original description remains a correct description. Otherwise there wouldn't be segregated events in practice like black family playground days or black only dormitories on campuses and minority only safe spaces. If what you point out is in practice, a Caucasian person attempting to enter one of those wouldn't be a problem. You can Google search how that isn't the case.