Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Can People Read My Email? (Score 1) 165

Can they read it? Yes, they can. Now that doesn't mean there is always someone out there reading your email. With millions of people on the Internet, our individual messages likely get lost in a crowd. But you've got to realized that once email leaves your system, it may sit on another computer hundreds or thousands of miles away, and you have no control over who has access to it. What if that computer has a liberal security policy, or is full of security holes? The best thing to do is realize that your email is not going to be secure and avoid transmitting sensitive material, as already recommended in Chapter 3. Even if no one reads your email in transit, the recipient could forward the message on to whomever he or she pleases.

It is possible to physically "tap" networks, just like tapping phone lines. And if someone is able to do that, he can read anything going across those wires. But all hope is not lost: There are ways to make your email more secure. One is to encrypt it before it leaves your computer. Encrypt means simply that it's encoded into something that no one else can read without the proper key. Upon receipt, the message must be decrypted on the the recipient's machine.

The Internet Companion: A Beginner's Guide to Global Networking, Tracy LaQuey, 1993, p.122.

Comment Re:Let me get this straight (Score 2) 182

Apart from in one of Ballmer's wet dreams, when on earth was WinCE (or its descendants) ever en route towards monopoly status?

In 2004, Windows Mobile (CE) had 11% market share in "smartphones". In 2005, this increased to 17%. In 2006, it moved up to 37% (tied with Blackberry, well ahead of Palm's 17% and Symbian's 9%), and in 2007, it hit 42% (while Blackberry lost share).

That flattening of the growth of Windows Mobile marketshare in 2007 may have been inevitable . . . but it may have been the iPhone. Nobody in late 2006 should have considered Microsoft taking an absolute majority in 2007 and then grinding down Blackberry into a niche by 2013 particularly unlikely. If the iPhone had flopped as bad as the previous "iPod phone" (the Motorola Rokr E1) . . .

Comment Re:They were greedy (Score 1) 320

or if they claim that the machine is "broken" and stiff the customer when it pays out a jackpot it wasn't supposed to (even if it was broken, as occasionally happens.)

The casino is specifically prohibited by law from paying out if the machine is broken.

Now, you then obviously would wonder, why is it prohibited by law?

And the answer is, because it makes money laundering incredibly easy. A drug cartel lord sends a bunch of minions into your casino with his in-cash drug profits, they lose it on a whole bunch of bets all over the place. Then he personally walks in uses the broken machine the two of you set up, and walks out with a whole pile of legitimately-won-from-a-casino-on-the-dollar-slots money.

Space

Lowell Observatory Pushes To Name an Asteroid "Trayvon" 588

Flash Modin writes "The observatory where Pluto was discovered is pushing to name an asteroid after a black teenager killed in a controversial confrontation in Florida last year. William Lowell Putnam III says his family has identified with the cause of African American rights, and thus an asteroid named after Trayvon Martin is perfectly appropriate. Putnam is the sole trustee of the observatory, which was founded by Percival Lowell during his search for canals on Mars. Astronomers at the observatory discovered the asteroid in 2000, but it has not been formally named. Putnam has already asked the Minor Planet Center once to designate the asteroid 'Trayvon,' but they told him the designation was 'premature.' Now that there's been a verdict, the observatory is reapplying in hopes the naming body will see things different."

Comment Re:counterargument: (Score 1) 580

Sure, the fifteenth century lacked sophisticated capital markets, requiring Columbus to pitch his project to people with crowns until he found one willing to give him the money. And that's relevant to today, with angel investors and venture capital how, exactly?

Yes, you're not going to get large bureaucratized businesses that resemble government in their structure and operations to open frontiers. That tells you exactly zero about what risks private capital is willing to take.

Comment Re:The key difference (Score 1) 692

Just because you can't follow an argument does not mean the argument is rooted in bias.

There is a fundamental difference between chatter on the Street from analysts nobody with actual money ever listens to, and board members who own large blocksof stock pressuring the CEO in board and personal meetings. The first is meaningless. The second forces the CEO to compromise or lose his job.

There are always, on every board of directors that ever existed, going to be people on the board (in Apples' case, pretty much all representatives of Wall Street investment firms) who have stupid ideas. In order for a company to excel, these idiots need to be neutralized. At Apple, this was done by Jobs's reputation, first as the company savior, later as a genius who made a lot of money inventing product categories.

Tim Cook does not have the reputation of Jobs. This wouldn't be a problem if he was a major shareholder whose personal friends controlled the company. But he isn't. He's a hired hand of the Board, and they know it. They will tell him to do what they want, and these will often be stupid things. Jobs could make them back off by threatening to quit; Cook has a lot less heft behind such a threat. He will have to compromise with them to a greater degree than Jobs, or get replaced by someone who will.

Which means the Wall Street investment drones on/influencing the board will start having their ideas implemented by Apple. Which will make Apple more like any other consumer electronics/tech company, no matter who picked the management team.

The empirical question is exactly how powerful and how stupid these board members are. If Apple is lucky, they will be relatively weak and relatively smart, for investment firm drones. In that case, Apple will only be hurt a little. If they are powerful and extremely stupid, Apple is going to become the next HP.

Comment Re:The key difference (Score 2) 692

It doesn't matter. The Jobs-picked team doesn't have the Jobs aura.

That's the big problem. Apple did plenty of bombs under Jobs; the Cube, the early forms of Apple TV, et cetera. Before the iPod, Mac unit sales and Apple revenue had a surge-and-retreat structure under Jobs. But Jobs has the clout to prevent any board revolts that might have stampeded Apple into a stupid direction.

Tim Cook doesn't have that. Every failed product (and if you're trying new things, some will fail), every temporary ebb, every drop in stock price is a reason for the board to second-guess Cook, forcing him to make compromises with the clueless.

It means it doesn't matter how good Tim Cook is, or the rest of his team. They're no longer sheltered from Wall Street Stupid the way Jobs sheltered them.

Comment Re:lawsuit by proxy? (Score 1) 367

When Jesus spoke on the matter, he didn't limit it to relations among Christians:

Matthew 5:39-42 - âoeBut I say to you, do not resist an evil person; but whoever slaps you on your right cheek, turn the other to him also. If anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, let him have your coat also. Whoever forces you to go one mile, go with him two. Give to him who asks of you, and do not turn away from him who wants to borrow from you."

Luke 5: 29-30 - âoeWhoever hits you on the cheek, offer him the other also; and whoever takes away your coat, do not withhold your shirt from him either. Give to everyone who asks of you, and whoever takes away what is yours, do not demand it back."

Comment Re:Dear Mozilla, (Score 2) 250

Dear Mozilla,

Try plotting those dates on the X axis against the Mozilla 4.0 alpha/beta/release cycle and the final end of support for 3.6.x. Go on.

So, since that UI change to be more like Chrome was demonstrably a failure, you're going to try being even more Chrome-like? Did you fall and hit your head?

My advice? Dump that Asa Dotzler shithead and actually try to win us back.

Your ex,
The Internet

Comment Re:Texas leads the way, again (Score 4, Insightful) 262

. . . which is why in the civilized parts of the world they put their soldiers in prison if they kill anybody in combat?

Every society in the world, without exception, allows agents of the state to use lethal force.

The implicit racism of declaring India, Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan uncivilized is truly disgusting. The idea that they're barbarians because they don't adhere to a recently-invented purely European standard of what circumstances allow lethal force to be used by the state is intellectually indefensible.

Comment Re:Summary is Crap (Score 4, Interesting) 169

Corrected version of above:

Argentina is likely the right place to look at when you want to see the results of a government being more involved instead of less. Shocked by the Great Depression, like many other countries Argentina turned to a strongman. Once in power, Peron did a deep change to the country, and Argentina swiftly fell from being one of the wealthiest countries in the world to a basket case. Now, instead of being as rich per capita as the US or Switzerland (like it was in the 1920s), it's in the same economic class as Russia and Botswana.

Despite this abject failure, the media can't point this out, because people will label them as traitors. It's extremely hard for Argentinians to be entrepreneurs in this context of unremediated Peronism, which has wrecked the Argentine economy.

Slashdot Top Deals

"When the going gets tough, the tough get empirical." -- Jon Carroll

Working...