Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:It only took a century (Score 3, Informative) 348

Did the law specifically outlaw incandescents? I don't think so. As I understand it, the law mandates higher efficiency. And you know what? I can now buy incandescents that put out more lumens per watt than previous generaiton bulbs. In my house I use each type of bulb as is appropriate. Philips Halogena for the kitchen floodlights, Philips higher efficiency incandescents in the bathroom, CFL's in most table lamps, and one LED bulb to try on one high use table lamp.

Your semi-rant smells of mindless talking point repetition.

Comment Re:Japan and Europe is where the industry is (Score 1) 599

It's the old anec-data syndrome.

I had a 1998 Audi A6. Well put together, nice materials, etc. But things broke - a lot. Cam tower seals, transmission, ABS, cup holders, door locks, headlight wiring, cooling fan, etc etc. And every time something broke, major bucks to fix.

We now have a 2005 Dodge Caravan and a 2007 Camry Hybrid. Both have been 100% reliable. Go figure.

Would I buy an Audi again? Not a chance.

Comment not always great in the Northeast (Score 1) 173

I live in the Northeast (NJ) and coverage at my house is pitiful. I can't imagine what it's like in more remote areas.

The thing that isn't mentioned much is that even in areas with good signal, the sound quality of current digital cellular systems stinks. Even back in the 90's, analog cellular had WAY better sound quality.

Comment Re:First Anecdote! (Score 1) 633

I've been in NYC hybrid taxis. The way the maniac taxi drivers drive, I guarantee they completely negate hybrid efficiency. The car is NEVER in battery mode because the driver ALWAYS has his foot to the floor.

On the other hand, I have a 2007 Camry Hybrid. it has been averaging about 32 mpg with my lead foot wife driving it. When I drive it, I average a few mpg more.

Comment Re:It won't last (Score 1) 377

Over the years, my encounters with unions have turned me off to the concept.

While in college, I worked at an on campus office. One day, one of the fluorescent bulbs failed. We called maintenance. The next day, a guy came with a ladder into the office and just stood there. We asked what he was waiting for. He said work rules required that he have a helper hold the ladder. I could have changed the bulb myself just by reaching up. The takeaway: the work rules unions get away with are insane.

My first job out of college was at a mass transit agency, I was forced to join a union (as a mechanical engineer). There, I encounterd many things that turned me off to unions: 1) everyone at the same grade level got the same raise, regardless of performance. 2) the union protected, seemingly to the death, any poor performing union member. We had a guy who used to fall asleep in the toilet reading a newspaper. They could not get rid of him.

My mother worked at a non-union garment factory. One day, several union thugs showed up at the door and threatened the owner and my mother. They menaced the workers for several weeks, but eventually gave up.

I understand that unions did much to help workers in the early part of the 20th century, but as they gained power, the corruption became too much and they rotted from the inside. Corporate corruption is manifested by the race to the bottom to get the least number of cheap foreign workers to replace locals. Unions are weak, but even if they regained strength, they would do everything to cut off their noses to spite their faces.

It's all very depressing.

Comment Re:also reduces IT costs (Score 1) 232

Agreed. It may or may not be beneficial to the business, but if upper management wants it, there's no point in fighting it. Pesky details such as the need for new policies, new infrastructure, ongoing support costs, etc, are meaningless. Oh, and if you can't implement in 1 month using your already overburdened staff, they'll outsource and eventually get rid of you.

Comment Re:Like lawyers, impose unrealistic limits (Score 1) 960

A few possibilities:

1. As part of increasing bonuses for upper management, firing as many people as possible, and offshoring as much as possible, your local IT staff has been reduced to less than a bare minimum. They can barely keep up with the flood of support tickets. Just wait until they too are fired and all support is handled out of India,

2. You actually have sufficient staff, but because companies are paying peanuts for desktop support staff, only the bottom of the barrel are hired. The unemployed but competent desktop support people are out there looking for jobs that pay living wages.

3. You may have sufficient support staff, but they or their managament are incompetent.

Slashdot Top Deals

2.4 statute miles of surgical tubing at Yale U. = 1 I.V.League

Working...