How does the lack of interest in something that geeky boys like in any way fall under the responsibility of those geeky boys, who have no influence over what non-geeky boys are interested in? It obviously does not, and that is why claims that it does fall under their responsibility sound absurd to us geeky boys.

Libertarians in practice are just conservatives without the context of history and social forces.

Writing walls of text without paragraphs is called lacking literary manners. The people I know who do it are the intellectual equivalent of obese people.

It seems to have backfired though, after Rantic was outed.

There's more to the value of labor than how much education someone has. I know it's hard for you to imagine what those other factors could be, but just because you can't imagine something doesn't mean it doesn't exist.

Slaves don't have opportunities to work as non-slaves. What on earth are you talking about.

We never know what anything is (noumena), we only know what it does (phenomena).

Good point. The article mis-labelled as "others have fallen for the Wave hoax" doesn't mention anything about anybody actually falling for it.

The "conversation" before Snowden was establishment voices calling people like us tinfoil hat wearing conspiracy theorists.

It's quite dogmatic to simply assume that there is no more to non-dogmatic critical thinking than common sense, or that common sense itself is not often dogmatic.

That's like calling spam "free advice".

The headline says they're replacing "Window Phone" with "Windows", but this is totally wrong. They're replacing "Windows Phone" with "Microsoft Lumia", and dropping the Nokia name completely as fast as possible.

Tips fedora.

As a man, I say speak for yourself, "sausagefest" does not offend me whatsoever.

Civ III. Civ V doesn't permit military stacks of death.