Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Class action suit? (Score 1) 548

I live in Springville, same deal, Comcast or slow DSL. The frustrating thing is that Springville is the birthplace of Utah's fiber network. Years back I was getting free, unlimited fiber connection from Airswitch (remember them?) because I lived in the same block as the founder. Airswitch continued to lay fiber lines throughout the state, only to go out of business. In most cases the cities in which the fiber was laid bought all of the lines. Well now I have fiber to my house, but Springville has no plans of doing anything with it. So I'm stuck with craptastic Comcast.

Comment Re:You really wanna save thousands of lives a year (Score 1) 16

So you think that big pharma is somehow better than the drug cartel? The only difference between them is legality. It shouldn't be regulated at all, save perhaps some agency that tests and labels the drugs so that folks know what they are buying exactly, and in what quantity. Let the free market regulate it. Addicts will be addicts regardless of law. The best thing we can do is try to help people be safe, and rid ourselves from the underground.

Comment Re:A little more (Score 1) 1153

Maybe not, but I feel like most people understand it whether they think they do or not. It's not really 'that' hard to understand is it? I think people are just scared of math and that emotion makes it so much harder for people to understand in theory.

I also feel that in K-12 laziness and lack of caring play a huge role in kids 'getting' it. So, in that sense he is right, we are wasting money on a lot of kids who just don't give a damn, I know I didn't at those stages in my life. We should find a way to funnel that money to younger kids who are truly interested in Math and Sciences. Or, maybe leave sciences out of it all together, I hated math in high school, but I loved the sciences.

Of course, the public school system is so fucked up right now thanks to good old government incompetence, that it is impossible to fund only the bright and eager ones.

My oldest son started Kindergarten this year, and we made the tough decision to put him in a private school. We essentially picked academics over sports and friends, only because he is a smart kid, smarter than I ever was at that age. He was reading at a 5th grade level by age 4, understood addition and subtraction early on, and he is extremely creative. His creativity is very much in robotics, space exploration. etc. etc.. He was always sketching out designs for various robots he wants to build from a very early age, and while not always very practical, he was always solving problems with his inventions, and every now and then this 5 year old kid has some very good, good ideas, so good I'd like to claim them as my own.

Why was private school a hard decision then? Well, because both of my sons also have my body build (I'm 6' 4" 230, and 230 is skinny, not working out. Any men on my fathers side are tall and thick, viking heritage), my oldest will be taller than I, though isn't quite as thick yet, but I was tall and scrawny until about 6th grade also. He loves sports, football, soccer, basketball, baseball, as does my youngest. We play all of the time as a family, and they play city league sports together already. He is also fascinated by martial arts, probably due to my almost embarrassing kung fu fetish, so he takes Hapkido twice per week. Again, he is really a very big kid, and due to him unintentionally, and continually harming the kids in his age group, they quickly asked our permission to move him into the next age group. So even with kids nearly twice his age in some cases, he is still excelling, and earning new belts at about 1.5 time the rate of the rest of his class. He is highly competitive, and I believe it is healthy to let him play that out in individual and team sports through adolescence.

In his case, we felt that his love of science and engineering, paired with the fact that he is very bright, outweighed the social, sporting, and a few other pluses that we saw in public school. Now, we raised both kids in the same environment, in the same way, only we tried to recognize and foster their strong points. My youngest son is not stupid by any means, but he doesn't seem to have the aptitude for math and science that my eldest does. He is 4 now, and attending preschool. We are told that he does well across the board, be he too is excelling with reading. I believe they are both a testament to the importance of reading to your children daily, starting at birth. I very rarely miss a day of reading with my boys. In fact, my 5 year old learned of cryptography through some World War II documentary he watched that covered Enigma, etc., and is now currently obsessed with 'secret codes'. I pulled out my old copy of The Code Book, and that is what we are now reading. My 5 year old gets giddy every night at story time to learn more about cryptanalysis, while my younger son is very neutral about the book, he hasn't complained about it, but he doesn't care much either. My oldest and I have been making our own simple substitution ciphers and writing each other secret messages every morning. He takes a lot of pleasure in he and I having our special things like that.

Anyway, my younger son is a much gentler and 'sweeter' little boy, his interests are very much in sports and music. I teach him guitar and drum lessons weekly, and one of his favorite indoor activities is pouring over my vinyl collection in the den and listening to record after record on headphones (he is welcome to be noisy, he just thinks headphones are cool). I am very into music, even made a living as a guitarist for a few years. As a consequence I have an mp3 (192k minimum) collection just over 200 gb. I was suffering from 'music overload' with digital music. I had already inherited a very sizeable vinyl collection from my parents (who gave me my own record player for my room at age 5 so I would stay out of the den), so several years back I stopped with digital music. I bought a slightly better than entry level HiFi setup, and decided that it was a good way to manage my music overload. If it's not released on vinyl, I don't buy it. I also feel it is the best way for my son to make a connection with music. He loves putting on an album and sitting and looking at the art and liner notes, always asking for help reading more difficult words, and demanding that I translate these liner notes into concepts he understands. He is becoming a bit of a music history buff.

My youngest is also, even though younger and a bit smaller, better at almost every sport they play together (he despised Hapkido and dropped out after only 2 classes). At three years old he was batting 1000 with slow pitch, and is disgusted that he has to play tee ball instead of 'real ball'. We have to make the private vs. public choice for him next year, and I think that he will be a much harder decision. He is automatically accepted into our older sons private school (they allow all -younger- siblings of already admitted children guaranteed acceptance), but in many ways I think he might be a better fit for public school. I think it will come down to his decision on whether he cares about going to school with his brother or not.

Now I know that most 'geeks' aren't into sports, but I played, and I enjoyed it (still do), and I was pretty nerdy. I never really gave much importance to sports, like i did science and coding, and music, but it was still an important part of my childhood.

Wow, I am really, really rambling on here. The point is, that with public schools in the horrible state they are in today, I think it is a very hard decision for a lot of parents to make. There are trade-offs to each. If we could just get schools back on track using some common sense like in this article, it would be a much easier decision to make.

Comment Re:Incoming IBM bloatware.... (Score 1) 160

Pure troll. The only thing still even remotely slow about java is Swing. Gui-less server-side java is damn near native speed, super fast. I really can't believe after all this time their are still so many misconceptions about Java. Probably just because a bunch of flunky PHP devs can't wrap their heads around real OO and Typing.

Comment Re:Whatever (Score 1) 657

No that tells you that since Apple won't allow Flash on the iPhone they were forced to build an app for the iOS so that those users weren't left out, that has nothing to do with HTML5, which is NOT wht there iOS app is built in. You have really only proved my point for me.

Comment Whatever (Score 1) 657

Whatever. As already pointed out, it really has nothing to do with Flash. The videos in question are simply not optimized for mobile consumption, they would suck just as bad in HTML5. I usually try to stay out of the whole Flash vs. HTML5 hurrah, but seriously, get a grip. HTML5 will not replace Flash. I have my issues with adobe, just like the next guy, but Flash is so much more than HTML5. Look at Hulu for example. Hulu wasn't scared by the HTML5 hype, they came right out and said what everybody already knows: even for video, HTML5 cannot replace Flash except for in the simplest of cases. Now, I have an Android running Flash, and it plays any video fit for mobile consumption just fine, I would even dare say fast. To boot, the overall Flash experience on Android is good, better than I expected even. I think Adobe has a narrow window in which to redeem themselves. If they can just focus, and get the Flash player streamlined across platforms (it is a definite hog on pretty much all desktop OS's), and pull their heads out and release a 64bit Linux player, then this will all go away. Otherwise we have at least 2 more years of these ad revenue prompted sensationalist "Flash Sucks" headlines, only to be ousted by "HTML5 Sucks" headlines down the road, first due to cross browser compatibility nightmares (javascript anyone?), only to eventually be trumped by "OMG, HTML5 is S Slow!" headlines after everyone's code is hacked and bloated to death trying to deal with multiple browser targets. This is the last I will ever chime in on this (maybe), so seriously, think for your damn selves for once and quit allowing yourselves to be all stirred up by a bunch of BS media shenanigans that started with none other than Steve Jobs, the master of media shenanigans himself. Or, continue to get off by complaining about Flash, and touting the wonders of HTML5 (which probably 80% of the "me too" idiots have probably never even demoed). Whatever, HTML5 is not the answer, in fact it is a step backwards, deal with it.

Comment Re:Aim for the real problem. (Score 0, Flamebait) 451

I agree. It is very frustrating that people can really, truly, be that damn stupid. And I mean that in the meanest possible way. Dumb fucks. However, I don't believe there are actually any explicit laws against using a persons stem cells for treatment. IIRC, the issue was that for research scientists needed the stem cells from aborted fetuses. And then out came the long line of dipshits to shut them down.

Slashdot Top Deals

Our business in life is not to succeed but to continue to fail in high spirits. -- Robert Louis Stevenson

Working...