My feeling is that no true comparison can be made because the costs borne by the company making the mistake are only half the equation. The costs borne by stock holders or computer owners are ignored. By scaling the costs to inflation one gets a feeling that a more precise comparison is being made but it ignores the larger impact of the mistakes. There is no simple comparison to be made. It is all bragging rights.
Why ignore inflation? [...] (ignoring adjustments for inflation)"
On the one hand, algorithmic trading can screw up royally and cost hundreds of millions in a matter of hours. On the other hand, human traders can screw up royally and cost billions over a few months.
I'm not sure which is worse. And of course in combination they can crash national economies.
One difference is that a slow moving wreck caused by humans with human consequences is within our toolset of things that we can react to and in some cases mitigate or avoid. A wreck that destroys things when you blink is on the wrong timescale for prudent reactions.
What other songs could the virus rock out with?
How about rickrolling?
So who the fuck enters "McDonalds" into Google every week/months?
Someone traveling. One day I really wanted to be home. The McDonald's breakfast I ate was consolation.
What the hell is a Gigawatt?
= Gigawhere / Gigawhen
I've noticed several design suggestions in your code.