I'm sure most people here will go on and on about how it's not FLAC, and whatever.
Maybe. But the nice thing about lossless encoding is that there's no generational loss. So just transcode your FLAC rips to ALAC to send to your Airport thingies. Still equivalent to the original CD!
yea if you want the overhead of compression / decompression on top of virtual memory.
It's a pay-off. Yes, it does cost you RAM. But compressed RAM is still much faster than rotating disk, and probably SSD too (for now). So sacrifice some RAM (and CPU) and save swapping quite as much.
Check the forums - people still haven't received this hardware and are cancelling their orders. The main website hasn't been updated in a year. AI showed some neat ideas but have utterly failed to deliver them. In the mean time the big manufacturers have picked up those ideas and are selling slick consumer devices you can actually buy. Sorry AI, you're dead.
Another neat idea they had was having the main system (SoC + Wifi + BT) in a phone-sized module with its own screen that can be removed from the tablet part and used as a (VOIP-only) smartphone. But that's also been tried by one or two big manufacturers since they showed this idea.
the professor literally went out of his way to play a clip of the bus jump in Speed
As opposed to, you know, figuratively playing the clip of the bus jump in Speed.
If you don't mind going a little DIY, there is the Ubiquiti RouterStation Pro. It's a board with four GigE ports and three mini-PCI slots for wireless cards, and comes loaded with Open WRT. Look around online and you should be able to find a few places selling it with a simple case, power pack, and a wireless card for ~$150 or less. Note, I haven't used it, so I can't speak from experience. It's on my wishlist though
I love my Milestone (essentially a "Droid"), but I have mixed feelings about the keyboard. Apart from only having four rows and thus requiring combinations a little too often, the main problem is Android itself. From what I understand, Android treats a screen rotation as another screen size, so the app redraws the screen in the new size. But if you have a "dialog box" up, that is lost. And it doesn't take a genius to realise that a dialog box is something you'll often be entering text into.
So what happens is this:
Even Google (App) Market does this. Yes, even the latest 3.0 version. If Google can't get this right, with one of their most important apps, what chance do we have with other software?
Rushed? Vista was extremely late because they tried to do too much (WinFS anyone?)
Yes, it was rushed. You're thinking of "Long Horn", which dragged on way too long and was eventually put on the back-burner when the higher-ups realised it wasn't going anywhere, or at least wasn't going anywhere fast enough. So Vista was then hurriedly put together in a few years.
And try to get one of these digital hearing aids through the gummint. Ain't gonna happen.
It does here in Australia:
The Australian Department of Health and Ageing provides eligible Australian citizens and residents with a basic hearing aid free-of-charge, though recipients can pay a "top up" charge if they wish to upgrade to a hearing aid with more or better features. Maintenance of these hearing aids and a regular supply of batteries is also provided, on payment of a small annual maintenance fee.
Do most (sane) administrators run anti-virus on each of their servers?
I guess you do if you're running Window servers, which apparently Diginotar were.
Name one single must-have feature that HTML+CSS can't provide, and the browsing public can't live without.
AJAX. Almost any large website will include dynamic content to some extent. Haven't you noticed?
The end result has been an absolute monstrosity (much like the GEGL logo) that has taken 12 years to build.
It's not that GEGL (and BABL) is large, simply that not many people are working on it. And like you said, porting/rewriting the internal tools to use GEGL, not to mention all of the plugins and scripting languages, is/will be a lot of work.
how would caring about single window mode require one to be a Windows drone?
Because Windows is the only desktop that makes managing windows so primitive. Unix/X11 has had multiple virtual desktops for decades. Even Mac OS/X has had Spaces since 2006. MS Windows just piles windows onto the single desktop. So to keep things cleaner, apps have to use the horrible MDI system, which nests document windows inside the main app window (essentially mimicking the original Mac layout inside a window). The downside is that the main window covers up your desktop and any other windows, which may need to be accessed.
You know the funny thing about this supposed Photoshop emulation? PS on Mac uses multiple windows and I haven't seen anyone complaining about that. So this single window BS is just emulating PS on Windows. I wish they'd put their effort into integrating GEGL instead and allowing use of 16-bit component images so I can finally do away with buggy CinePaint.
"Experience has proved that some people indeed know everything." -- Russell Baker