Again, as I said in the comment I replied to a few minutes ago, those are not naturally occurring situations, those are situations created by man.

Rats didn't swim to easter island and cats were introduced in some regions by humans, too - not to mention that the latter are a species created by humans.

Look folks, it's quite simple: species don't anihilate each other just like that, because it would disrupt the whole ecosystem around them. This isn't rocket science and even farmers (no disrespect meant, it's just that farmers are not biologists, just as biologists wouldn't know how to grow corn) know what happens when some animal species gets wiped out from a region. The effects can be invisible or can be catastrophic. And Nature doesn't "let" such things happen just like that. The whole system is "built" on a very delicate balance.

Enough babling, I think I made my point.

Although logically correct, I don't think your arguments are valid, because you are mentioning situations that do not occur naturally in nature - they are created by man.

Actually, Bananatree3 is right: we are the only species that destroy our own world and lead other species to extinction.

What you are talking about is natural selection, something that occurs naturally; what Bananatree3 was talking about is doing it on purpose, in a unnatural way.

The domain owner is not stupid. He possibly bought the domain because he had other plans for it. The web is full of sites with "cool" and "funny" domain names like this one. Why should this be different? What he should do is let the banks and companies sue him for having their private documents, and then counter-sue and make a big pile of money. That would probably teach something to those stupid admins. But even if it didn't, at least he'd be rich. I know I'd hope that it would go on, if I were him.