Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Molestation charge (Score 1) 529

> You rattle on about "senior socialist politicians" in Sweden, but you think the major parties in the USA are both right wing?

For a European, that is EXACTLY the way the US looks.

Mod this person up! As a citizen of the UK I'm usually of the same opinion (and that's after decyphering the difference between US and European understandings of political terms, such as Liberals.)

Comment Re:It should be: 4+3+2=x+2 (Solve for x) (Score 1) 1268

If the test writer used "x" or any single letter variable (other than i maybe) I bet you most students would have correctly answered the question because it would be unambiguous that they were being provided an equality.

You mean you don't think most would have wondered how on earth you'd add a letter and a number???

Comment Re:It should be: 4+3+2=x+2 (Solve for x) (Score 1) 1268

If I started using the word 'chicken' to describe that four wheeled thing you drive to work in, it'd take you a while to understand what I was on about, and you might draw some erroneous conclusions in the mean time.

And how a person arrived at those conclusions would be very revealing, and might tell us something about that persons understanding of the world - much as this test is attempting to ascertain someone's understand of the equals sign, not their ability to perform solve formal algebra correctly. (I do agree with a poster above, that a ? may have been a better symbol, but perhaps what was actually on the paper was a clear blank space, perhaps underlined, equally clear - it was unlike to have been just "()".)

Comment Re:It should be: 4+3+2=x+2 (Solve for x) (Score 1) 1268

I agree with the "solve for x" guy - why reinvent the standard for equation formatting.

Because it's not a test of algebra, it's aimed at a far lower level, at people who would probably freak at seeing "x" in basic calculations. It's testing the understanding of an equals sign, and no more!

Security

OAuth, OpenID Password Crack Could Affect Millions 304

CWmike writes "Researchers Nate Lawson and Taylor Nelson say they've discovered a basic security flaw that affects dozens of open-source software libraries — including those used by software that implements the OAuth and OpenID standards — that are used to check passwords and user names when people log into websites such as Twitter and Digg. By trying to log in again and again, cycling through characters and measuring the time it takes for the computer to respond, hackers can ultimately figure out the correct passwords. This may all sound very theoretical, but timing attacks can actually succeed in the real world. Three years ago, one was used to hack Microsoft's Xbox 360 gaming system, and people who build smart cards have added timing attack protection for years. The researchers plan to discuss their attacks at the Black Hat conference later this month in Las Vegas."

Comment Re:Maybe something everybody can use? (Score 1) 393

I take it you have not seen the multitudes of local and state government web sites that blindly spout that their web site only works with Internet Explorer. BTW, they have been doing that for well over 10 years.

I certain have, and am not happy! Unfortunately, my local area adult learning service (council run) has this problem - can't access my course materials with Firefox etc. :( When I find myself needing to use such sites, I do normally follow the complaints procedures. To be fair, I have found very with such problems few nowadays. Doesn't stop them being quite crap and with a tendancy to render poorly with anything but the most recent browsers though!

Comment Re:iphone (Score 1) 393

It's incredibly disingenuous to liken the licence fee to income tax or VAT. Choosing not to watch live television transmissions is a hell of a lot easier than living off the grid or on benefits.

But chosing not to watch live television transmission is, I gather, surprisingly hard work, resulting in a LOT of hassle from the licensing authority, so I gather. :(

Comment Re:iphone (Score 1) 393

British, UK, taxpayer dollars? Spot the odd one.

That made me giggle too. :) Joking aside, in my few international ebay auction, I've had US winners refuse to pay as they did not understand that a UK£1 is not the same thing as US$1, and yes, in US$ it was more expensive than they realised! (Even though I made it clear for them in the auction description.) Yeah yeah, I know its not a US thing - people in general everywhere are stupid. :)

Comment Re:iphone (Score 2, Informative) 393

Good point, so we should berate them for setting up all the Gov websites too, as not everyone has access to the internet,

Which is exactly why libraries here provide access to computers and the internet. (And yes, they're normally well used!)

and obviously any new road building must be shelved until we can ensure everyone has a car!

Excluding motorways (for which I might agree with you) public highways are for bikes and pedestrians and buses and other transport, not just cars.

Comment Re:Maybe something everybody can use? (Score 1) 393

Additionally that link didn't make it clear whether those statistics were based on sales, or on what is actually being used out there.

In the UK (and I believe in much of Europe), mobiles have been popular for a long time to a wide selectino of the public, especially Pay-as-you-go, and consequently out there in the real world there are huge numbers of individuals using older non-smart phones.

Not everyone is hoping up the rungs on the phone-upgrade-ladder.

Slashdot Top Deals

He has not acquired a fortune; the fortune has acquired him. -- Bion

Working...