Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Too bad we don't have rules to deal with this (Score 1) 839

I don't brake at every green light, but I do sometimes wait a half a second or two when the light turns green to make sure that the dumbasses have finished running the red light, rather than just jump on the gas and get t-boned. Are you the type that is in the car behind me laying on the horn 0.01 milliseconds after the light turns green, or indignant that I don't make a left turn in the path of an oncoming cement truck?

Comment Re:Why Are We Deferring to an Economic Organizatio (Score 1) 715

And for some reason, we're not demanding they open the sequencing data on the cancer gene we just accepted that story and we trusted those scientists.

Are you sure we're not? I haven't seen a published genomics paper in years that doesn't have the raw data accessible in some form. It's a requirement for most major journals, as well as from most funding sources. If you want to publish, you release the data.

I agree with you that every moron thinks they can analyze the climate data better than the entire field of climatologists. Relatively few people think they understand particle physics better than the people at CERN; but somehow everyone thinks they're an expert on climate change after reading a few headlines that they instinctively disagree with (although they don't actually understand). Science is rarely a good spectator sport.

Comment Re:Sh..... (Score 1) 534

Some of them, yes, were certainly the "best and brightest". The problem isn't with the personnel in the military that are operating this technology, it's with the corrupt procurement system. These systems were designed and built by the big defense contractors, and they were paid handsomely to do so. There's no incentive for them to be cost-effective, or to go above the minimum requirements. Heck, if they don't meet the minimum requirements they'll get a new contract to fix their mistakes in a few years. These systems take so long to get in place that they're outdated by the time they hit the ground. And the way they are designed, spec'd, and implemented means that simple updates take years and billions of dollars.
Image

The Perfect Way To Slice a Pizza 282

iamapizza writes "New Scientist reports on the quest of two math boffins for the perfect way to slice a pizza. It's an interesting and in-depth article; 'The problem that bothered them was this. Suppose the harried waiter cuts the pizza off-center, but with all the edge-to-edge cuts crossing at a single point, and with the same angle between adjacent cuts. The off-center cuts mean the slices will not all be the same size, so if two people take turns to take neighboring slices, will they get equal shares by the time they have gone right round the pizza — and if not, who will get more?' This is useful, of course, if you're familiar with the concept of 'sharing' a pizza."

Comment Re:Nice try (Score 3, Insightful) 736

And lastly...I'm sorry but if the friggin tree ring data is not valid for assessing temperature after 1960, then it is not valid assessing temperature before 1960.

There's about a million possible reasons why tree-ring observations don't seem to work for relatively recent data. It's possible that newly formed tree rings change somewhat in the 30 or 40 years after they are initially formed until they reach a "stable" form. It's possible that the substantial increases in CO2 in the atmosphere in recent years has altered the way that tree rings form.

All measurement methods have their anomalies. MRI scans are a great way to look at the structure of the brain, but they have substantial distortions, that change from machine to machine. Some of these have to do with the type of machine, and some distortions are due to things like the earth's magnetic field or the building that houses the machine. Those have to be corrected for, and it's standard practice. And, scans of young children don't give the same results, because the brain structures haven't matured, so it's difficult if not impossible to distinguish many brain structures. That doesn't mean it's not a useful method, but one does need to keep the limitations and difficulties of each measuring methodology in mind.

There are very accurate temperature measurements recorded for many places dating back to the late 1700s, recorded using a thermometer. If the tree rings for those areas match very well for the 150 years prior to 1960, but begin to diverge after that, it wouldn't be that outrageous to suggest that the inability to use them as a measurement proxy for recent times is just a limitation of the system.

It would be nice to have perfect measurements for everything. However, for those of us in the real world, all measurements have errors and limitations, and we have to adapt for these. Simply dumping uncorrected, uncalibrated, or inaccurate measurements into the pool of data does not make things clearer.

Comment Re:$125.00 per hour (Score 1) 454

One great way to avoid being nagged for favors is to take extra time to do them, then do them in a way the recipient won't ask again.

Doing things just to be a bastard is, well, dickish. If you're going to fuck up people's work, just say "No, I can't help you".

However, I'm all for the "extra time" part. It works for co-workers that have "learned helplessness" as well. If you jump immediately to help them, it's easier for them to never learn. If you make them wait, and wait long enough it causes some inconvenience, it makes taking steps to becoming self-sufficient a more attractive option.

So, I'm all for the "Hey, sure, I'll show you how to do that, but it will have to wait until after my business trip. How does a week from tuesday work for you?" option.

Comment Re:This comment surprises me (Score 1) 640

Put your kid in front of an XBox, Playstation, DS, Windows, Linux, you name it. She will likely do just fine.

She's a smart kid, that's true. But she couldn't read more than about half a dozen words at that point. She still can't get through a DVD menu that she hasn't seen before, because there aren't 'standard icons' to start the movie. I'd bet if I handed you a new consumer device that you'd never used before, and the interface was in a language you couldn't read, that you'd find it a bit difficult to navigate. You might, by trial and error, be able to get things to work after some effort. My point was that she had movies running within a minute, not by banging on buttons until something magically happened.

Comment Re:This comment surprises me (Score 0) 640

You can literally hand any one an iphone and they can figure out how to make calls with it and surf the web without being told how. Maybe one day other companies will figure out that the interface matters more than the hardware specs. that people with big fingers can't push tiny little keyboard buttons to enter phone numbers with. That as you age you lose the dexterity of a 15 year old. I have watched business people use the blackberries, and all they do is struggle with it. I hand them my iphone and they find they can do the things they just were easily, not trying to use a scroll ball half the size of the tip of their pinky.

Exactly. I bought an ipod touch for "entertainment" on a cross country flight with my kids. My just-turned-five year old had it up and running, pulling up movies and playing the games that I put on there with no help, except for showing her how to turn it on and telling her to "touch the screen". That's why people buy an iPhone/iPod, and that's why they're cooler than the LG whatever or the Zune.

For the non-technical crowd, that simplicity -- simple but still usable devices -- makes Apple stuff "cool". Microsoft has never even remotely approached that level.

Slashdot Top Deals

"God is a comedian playing to an audience too afraid to laugh." - Voltaire

Working...