Kinect was a interesting product that they under-captilized on. Why weren't they able to do with motion tracking what Apple did with touch based interfaces? Build an entire new ecosystem of products and services that never existed before?
Because motion tracking as it is at the moment is only useful for dancing games, for any other type of purpose it is more effort, less responsive than other controllers and in many cases completely unworkable. The fact that MS failed to recognize this after their first attempt shows how much out of touch they are with the wishes of the consumer and the product they are making, a gaming device.
In the high end market apple is still king.
In the States that perhaps is still the case. In the rest of the world, especially here in Europe Apple lost a lot of its "cool" factor and Samsung has a clear lead over Apple with other high end brands also doing well. I think this is totally deserved since Apple doesn't back up their premium prices with premium support, far from it.
install it in a virtual machine, run it from there, this is lame.
I am guessing they will be providing a license that allows you to do that. For a premium of course.
To do nothing is to be nothing.