Comment Re:Honeycomb is... (Score 1) 295
And while you wait for your delicious diabetes-in-a-box to arrive in the mail, you can watch the 1970s ad.
And while you wait for your delicious diabetes-in-a-box to arrive in the mail, you can watch the 1970s ad.
We now have four rectors that needs to be cooled down, built in and kept under close watch for a couple of hundred thousands of years.
Try switching to these four rectors instead then. They look pretty cooled down from here, and I seriously doubt they'll be around for a thousand days, never mind years.
BTW, when did Cheerios lose the capital letter a la xerox?
Apparently it happened sometime between May 18, 2005 and Feb 03, 2006.
Now we need to establish the perp and the motive.
I've never donated pie to support development of a Firefox extension before, but I'm willing to learn.
I would sample insect-based food, for the same reasons that I eat foods made with yeast, if...
a) I was certain it wouldn't harm me,
b) if it had been killed with minimal suffering, and
c) if I could figure out how to cook it in a tasty way.
Nearly all modern meat production and fishery fails test b), so I rarely eat meat.
Postgres development team, if you're reading this, I lost my old ash-grey PostgreSQL shirt and would be glad to buy a replacement from you.
It merely states that some sections of the church hold less or more strongly to the 39 articles [anglicansonline.org].
Yes, that's what the post which you contradicted said: "certain-Anglicans believe it's not "symbolically" eating his flesh, it's really eating his flesh".
For reference the 39 articles would be like the constitution of the church. I suggest you read the one of the Lord's supper (XXVIII).
While technically correct that the Lutheran church does not hold to the doctrine of transubstantiation, they do hold to a doctrine that says that bread and the wine are literally the body and blood of christ.
Yes, that's right, (XXVIII) "Of the Lord's Supper." , which states "the Bread which we break is a partaking of the Body of Christ; and likewise the Cup of Blessing is a partaking of the Blood of Christ."? Article XXVIII condemns transubstantiation but is read by many Anglicans as supporting sacramental union or consubstantiation, as articulated by Luther. It would be a bit pedantic then, to say that Lutherans believe in the Real Presence in the Eucharist, but that Anglicans do not.
So many wars to choose from... so little time.
Where there's a will, there's a relative.