Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Monsanto takes .. (Score 1) 419

There was at least one case of a farmer who bought his seed from a grain elevator and simply planted it. He was not replanting crop he had bought from Monsanto. He was buying whatever seed happened to be in that elevator and planting it, exactly like farmers have done for thousands of years.

You don't actually say so, but you seem to imply that the farmer was sued by Monsanto for doing this. If so, you are wrong. Monsanto has never sued anyone for unintentionally planting their GMO seeds. If you really believe otherwise, then you can prove me wrong by citing a single example where they have done so.

Comment Re:Monsanto takes .. (Score 1) 419

So I am still waiting for a single citation for Monsanto suing anyone for unintentional infringement.

Then read the fucking article.

I have. It contains no such citation.

He bought bulk seed from a grain elevator, planted it, didn't use any Monsanto products, but now finds himself in a lawsuit.

You left out a few steps. He bought the seed, sprayed it with glyphosate to kill the non-GMO plants, harvested the resulting pure-GMO seed, and used it the following year to grow crops treated with glyphosate. Are you seriously suggesting that was unintentional?

Comment Re:Monsanto takes .. (Score 1) 419

Sorry, but bullshit.

No it isn't. Monsanto has never sued anyone for unintentional infringement. If you want to prove me wrong, all you have to do is cite a single example of them doing so.

Your post includes two links, both of which point to anti-Monsanto rants. They both describe the case of Percy Schmeiser, who has admitted in court to intentional and deliberate infringement of Monsanto's patents.

So all you need is a single example of someone sued for unintentional infringement to prove me wrong.

Comment Re:Or, we could have just done nothing... (Score 1) 61

Sure, but when the rewards are greater than the cost of the consequences of the mistakes, those mistakes become more frequent.

BP has already paid out tens of billions in fines and compensation. There are plenty more lawsuits in the pipeline, with a potential final payout of about $90 billion. That is an immense amount of money, far more than the GDP of most countries. You can be pretty sure that the oil companies are going to be a lot more careful in the future.

Comment Re:Monsanto takes .. (Score 1) 419

You are obviously a paid shill.

Nope, I just enjoy being a contrarian. On other days I have defended fracking, high frequency traders, etc. When everybody is jumping on a politically correct bandwagon, someone should point out when there are no wheels on the wagon.

Just cite ONE ARTICLE claiming Bowman actually used Roundup/glyphosate on the second generation seeds he bought from the elevator.

Sure. I have posted this citation elsewhere, but I will repeat it here so this thread is not left dangling. From the cited article: Bowman also bought seeds from a local commodity seed provider and planted a second crop. Finding that the majority of seeds purchased from the local provider were herbicide resistant, Bowman also treated them with herbicide.

He has openly admitted that he used glyphosate on the crops grown from the commodity seeds. His defense is that he as a right to do so, not that he didn't do it.

Comment Re:Monsanto takes .. (Score 1, Insightful) 419

"took full advantage of the GMO by spraying their crops with glyphosate"

Please show sources for this assertition. It is not mentioned in TFA.

Sure, here you go. From the citation: Bowman also bought seeds from a local commodity seed provider and planted a second crop. Finding that the majority of seeds purchased from the local provider were herbicide resistant, Bowman also treated them with herbicide.

So he bought commodity seeds, sprayed them with glyphosate to kill the non-GMO plants, and then harvested the pure GMO seeds to plant the following year. Bowman has not denied any of that, but has instead claimed that he had a right to do it.

Comment Re:Monsanto takes .. (Score 0) 419

"I am no fan of Monsanto, but... I posted countless times in this thread defending their evil practices,

I am not defending Monsanto. I am attacking dishonesty and false allegations. There is no need to defend their "evil practices" when neither you nor anyone else seems to have any evidence that they actually engaged in those practices. If you disagree then cite an example .

Comment Re:Monsanto takes .. (Score 0) 419

Do you work for Monsanto, or their law group?

Nope. I am not "pro-Monsanto", I am "anti-bullshit". As I write this, there are over 200 posts, many of them making allegations without a single citation or reference to back them up. Just because hating Monsanto is "politically correct" doesn't make it okay to just make crap up, and spread falsehoods. We should have higher standards than that.

So instead of impugning my integrity, why don't you cite a single example that refutes what I have said: That Monsanto has never sued anyone for unintentionally infringing their GMO patents. I don't know for certain if that is true. All I am saying is that I don't know of a single instance of it happening. And apparently neither do you.

Comment Re:Monsanto takes .. (Score 1, Insightful) 419

Search and you'll find plenty of cases where farmers planted their own seeds and got their fields infected with GMO ...

Actually, if you search, you will find precisely zero cases where this happened. If you want to prove me wrong, then cite one case where a farmer was sued for unintentional infringement.

Slashdot Top Deals

Never test for an error condition you don't know how to handle. -- Steinbach

Working...