Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Bootcamp bubble popped... (Score 3, Interesting) 101

I suspect it's most useful for people who are already able to program but who want a crash course in web development.

If you already know coding, you can learn webdev in a few days from free on-line tutorials or maybe a $20 book from Amazon.

everyone from kindergarteners to grandmas should be learning to "code"

Nearly everyone can benefit from coding. I have written many Google Sheets triggers, plugins for Quickbooks, etc. for friends and relatives. These are usually a dozen or so lines of Javascript, and maybe a few regexes. If you can code, this is trivial, but if you can't then you are stuck.

All of these people took algebra in high school. None of them have used algebra, even once, since HS. So it is silly that our schools teach algebra and not coding ... and please don't say "You need algebra to understand coding" because that is patently false. I have taught 4th graders to code, and they certainly haven't learned algebra.

Comment Re:Wheres the source of the cash? (Score 1) 252

Wealth is absolutely a fixed size pie. Scarcity of resources is the fundamental problem that economics tries to solve.

You are applying 19th century economics to the 21st century. Five of the biggest corporations in America are Apple, Google, Microsoft, Amazon, and Facebook. None of them rely on coal or iron ore. They rely on human ingenuity and intellectual property, neither of which is inherently limited.

1. Legal expenses, which are a one time cost

I incorporated on-line for $200. I spent $0 on legal fees.

2. Double taxation, which my plan would eliminate

Most corps in America are S-Corps, which are not subject to double taxation.

Comment Re:Don't shoot until you see the whites of their e (Score 1) 360

That only keeps the peace for the people back home... in the land of the dominant enforcer. Everyone else has to deal with war on their doorstep.

It keeps the peace for everyone who accepts the current world order. Today, that is most of the world, which is more peaceful than ever before in history. Even most muslim countries accept American hegemony. The only real challenges to the Pax Americana are in a few Shiite countries (Iran, Syria) and a few non-state entities (ISIS, Hezbollah, the Houthi tribe in Yemen). China may challenge America in the future, but their current activities in the SCS don't amount to much, and are not a direct threat to American interests.

Comment Re:Value of crypto currency (Score 3, Insightful) 66

Is all crypto currency over-valued when it is so frequently anonymously stolen?

It was not "stolen". Crypto-currencies are based on the implementing code, and the only "rules" are in the code. So if the code allowed someone to transfer ownership, then that transfer followed the "rules" and is just as legitimate as any other transfer. Just because some people misunderstood the rules, that doesn't make it "wrong" for someone else to follow them to their own advantage.

Comment Re:It's a matter of time... (Score 1) 360

What if you miss?

The ship is generally lower than the target, and the earth is a sphere. So a miss will exit the atmosphere and dissipate in space.

Air travel would be a no-go if certain nations had these things.

Commercial aviation tends to avoid war zones. But the risk is infinitesimal anyway. During WW2, 50,000 anti-aircraft rounds were fired for every downed enemy aircraft. These were actually aimed at the aircraft, and many of them had proximity fuses and were area weapons. Even in the extremely unlikely even that this laser hits a commercial aircraft, it needs to be held on target long enough to heat it up, and that is even more unlikely to happen inadvertently.

Comment Re:Don't shoot until you see the whites of their e (Score 2) 360

So you'd rather ban lasers and force armies to stick with bullets,

Throughout history, people have claimed that new more efficient weapons would lead to less killing. Prior to WW1, some people claimed that a future war would have few casualties since a single machine gun could replace 20 soldiers with rifles. It didn't turn out that way.

The best way to keep the peace is to insure that the dominant enforcer of the current world order remains dominant. In 1914, that was Britain, and the challenger was Germany. Today, it is America, and the future challenger may be China.

Comment Re:It's a matter of time... (Score 1) 360

The reason to ban nuclear weapons is the dangers they pose to places and times far away from and long after the battle.

Another reason that NW could be banned is that a ban could actually be enforceable. Nukes require a lot of infrastructure and emit detectable radiation. With these $1 per shot lasers, there is no way a ban could be enforced. They are dual-use technology, so it would be easy to disguise a weapons program as an industrial or scientific project.

Slashdot Top Deals

Never ask two questions in a business letter. The reply will discuss the one you are least interested, and say nothing about the other.

Working...