Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Tandy Computer Whiz Kids (Score 1) 372

Good list indeed, but probably not for another four/five years or so. Three is very young for all that. Every kid is different, but my four year old is definitely not ready for that. My six year old, however, is starting to show interest. Early stuff like the first tintin's were written for a different world and could be better suited for an age when you can explain a thing or two in some context to your child.
Google

Submission + - Trimble buys Sketch from Google (trimble.com)

Chrutil writes: Interesting news in the field of 3d — Trimble, a company known for their surveying equipment is buying SketchUp from Google.

Comment Re:Paramount's definition of "Monetize" (Score 4, Insightful) 288

I suppose Monetize means using "Hollywood accounting" to pretend no money was made from enormous profits.
No question Louis CK made good money of it (rightfully so), and I really hope others that use the same methods will as well.
Jim Gaffigans recent Mr. Universe, for example (and yes - get it and see it - best ever)
Google

Submission + - Blind Man Drives Car with Help from Google (greencarreports.com)

thecarchik writes: Steve Mahan got into a Toyota Prius hybrid, drove to the dry cleaner's, picked up some clothes he'd left to be cleaned, and drove home. The trip was about a mile and a half. Steve Mahan is legally blind. He's lost 95 percent of his vision. He did it, though, with a little help from Google.

The car he happened to be driving was one of several Google Self-Driving Priuses, outfitting with an array of cameras, sensors, and processing algorithms to ensure it can sense, interpret, and react to its environment in real time--driving as safely as any other driver. Google’s bills him as “Self-Driving Car User #0000000001,” so the distinction of being the first official non-driver driver of a Google self-driving car who doesn’t work for Google falls to him.

Idle

Submission + - Borat used for Patent prior art (ipwatchdog.com)

Kurofuneparry writes: "Rarely does patent law meet pop culture so hilariously. But it gets to a more important point: An invention cannot be patented if there has been a public disclosure of said invention prior to the date of filing." Not exactly a tech patent, but it does comically display the kind of prior art searches that are often being done so poorly in the tech industry by the over-burdened patent office. After talking about how a "scrotal support garment" patent is invalidated by the Borat movie, the article also mentions a case involving Apple last year as well as a case in which the Bible was used for prior art.

Comment Re:"Impersonate" is probably too strong (Score 1) 233

In this day and age, who is smart enough to pick up a lost phone in a bar and then try to sell it superstitiously and is still to dumb to tell a real cop from a rent-a-cop?

Only someone *dumb enough* to pick up a lost phone and try to sell it, wouldn't be able to tell the difference....

Slashdot Top Deals

A morsel of genuine history is a thing so rare as to be always valuable. -- Thomas Jefferson

Working...