Employed before the pilot: 112. Such unemployed during the pilot: 32. Almost all of those (29) were precariously employed, i.e. their job security was low and they were likely to become unemployed anyway. Only 3 moved from full-time to unemployed.
Unemployed before the pilot: 77. Such employed during the pilot: 10.
Net based on 112 employed becoming 99 employed: 22 or 19.6%.
Of those 22, 13 dropped out of the workforce to go back to college full-time and become more-efficient workers. Excluding those from the unemployed leaves net 9 of 112 or 8%. A total of 53--including those unemployed before the pilot--either stopped working to go to college full-time or reduced their working hours to take up education and job skill training in hopes of improving their employment situation.
Over 3/4 of those unemployed during the pilot reported health issues that made it difficult to work.
Besides going to college, exiting the workforce due to health issues, and having unstable jobs in the first place, it's notable that people tend to stay unemployed longer when they have access to better support between jobs because they are able to balance the information asymmetry. That is to say: people don't rush to the next job as fast, and so collect more information about the job market, locate a better job where their skills are more-applicable and they are more productive, and have a better understanding of current salaries so as to negotiate good pay. This generally increases GDP.
It sounds strange, but longer periods of unemployment for individuals who become unemployed (micro, not macro) are much better for the economy than short periods.