Comment Bansky? (Score 2) 158
He's supposed to be from Bristol, after all.
He's supposed to be from Bristol, after all.
"The supposed "backdoor" the Guardian is describing is actually a feature working as intended, and it would require significant collaboration with Facebook to be able to snoop on and intercept someone's encrypted messages, something the company is extremely unlikely to do."
A backdoor that requires Facebook's help to snoop is still a backdoor, is it not?
Thanks for this!
Who were the other early ISPs in the UK? I remember UUNET, Zynet, Demon -- something called The Free Net, too?
Replaces all instances of Trump with Drumpf (go to youtube and search for John Oliver Drumpf if you don't get it.)
LOL... the 5 was million, not billion. Misread on my part... }:-)
His model suggests that the ones that collided to make these gravitational waves were stars that formed 12 billion years ago, became black holes 5 million years later, and then merged 10.3 billion years after that.
Did he do his experiment 3.3 billion years in the future?
Of course, it could just be a typo...
I was running Android studio 1.5 on an i3 with 4GB of RAM. Emulator load time was about 3 minutes, gradle builds were 1-3 minutes, time between gradle build finish and app launch was about a minute.
After upgrading to 2.0, emulator load time is now 11 minutes, gradle builds are nearly five minutes and it takes nearly 3 minutes between gradle build finish and app launch.
It's only obstruction of justice if you do it to a phone that the FBI already has in its possession. Phones which have not been seized as evidence are fair game.
More than half of 1000 people are wrong. The header is misleading as hell.
Apple should create the version of iOS that the government is asking for that is specific to the phone in question. That keeps them out of trouble.
At the same time, and prior to turning over the signed image to the FBI, they should also create a version of iOS that doesn't accept updates if the phone is locked.
They should then very quietly push the secure version of iOS out to all iPhones. From that moment forward, they will be unable to comply with any further court orders.
Problem solved.
The only reason that websites know that the ads aren't reaching the intended target is because they're using javascript to test to see if the ad makes it into the page. The solution is to stop checking. As long as you're making a good faith effort to display the ads, it's not your job to be sure that they made it to the target. If I'm the publisher of a print magazine and I put ads in the magazine, I bill the vendors for the ad space. I have no way of knowing whether the reader actually reads the ad and it's not my job to know. The same principle applies to websites. Bill the vendors for the ads you attempted to insert and you're not losing money.
"Experience has proved that some people indeed know everything." -- Russell Baker