What gets me is that they called the kid in, presented the photo as evidence of his wrongdoing, and didn't expect any negative comeback?
That's frightening - they sooo thought what they were doing was ok, they didn't think people would go mad over this...
That mindset in a school teacher is scary
Its LESS DECEPTIVE that the old way.
Before, you'd see blogger.com or youtube.com or many of the others, and not necessarily know it was google.
Now, ALL google companies are using 1e100.net for the reverse, so you can tell straight away it's a google server without needing to know all the spinoffs and other companies they may have bought.
Both you and the parent are wrong.
They are using 1e100.net for the REVERSE LOOKUP. And to keep things right, they also have the corresponding domain name with the relevant A record.
However, they don't actively use these domain names in the web requests, and squid logs the web address request, NOT the reverse PTR.
All your accesses to google, youtube and others are 1e100.net if you look up the PTR
Ahhh, Gcc doesn't like the smiley face at the end of line 20
You are wrong.
I have released bug free software.
Here it is, under creative commons license:
10 PRINT "Hello World"
20 GOTO 10
oops, I mean:
echo "noembed=1" >> ~/.mplayer/mplayerplug-in.conf
Your first post said "there is nothing wrong with domain squatting"
Now you appear to say that it's necessary evil because we can't 'fix' it without causing problems elsewhere.
The latter I'm more intended to agree with.
Well, the message you were replying to said:
"Based on the video id, the actual file location of the video itself can be found."
implying playing the video directly, or downloading it first, either of which
mplayer can do with mp4's or with flash files.
That doesn't matter - mplayer and just about everything else can play
UNIX was not designed to stop you from doing stupid things, because that would also stop you from doing clever things. -- Doug Gwyn