Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Hey Canvas - Randomize the presentation to grad (Score 1) 49

Randomness may not be required, but at least varying "who starts first" and maybe the "direction" (alphabetical or reverse-alphabetical) would add some fairness.

This assumes the phenomenon is real and not a one-off that will fail in a reproducibility study.

If this isn't real, it's not limited to Canvas - even in my grandparent's day some teachers sorted students work before grading.

Comment Re:Screw the American auto industry (Score 1) 288

T

And of course they have the best battery tech. Many European manufacturers, and Tesla, use Chinese LFP batteries because they are unbeatable. We really missed the boat, but it's even worse for Japanese companies who insist on using Japanese batteries.

We need to get on top of this, fast.

I wonder - is this anti-Chinese propaganda then? https://www.youtube.com/result... (compliation of burning Chines EV's)

I like EV's but there seems to be a disconnect between your claims of European Luxury level design, the best battery technology, and those burny things.

Comment Re:Screw the American auto industry (Score 1) 288

Then let China sell cars in the US.

I didn't say they shouldn't. Maybe every American will suddenly want a Chinese EV instead of what they are driving now, but I'm doubtful.

I don't know if it is something actual or just propaganda, but on Youtube, there are a lot of Chinese EV's catching fire, with videos showing it.

The amount of energy stored in the batteries is pretty significant, and unless properly engineered, likes out of its container and gets burny. Just like say, the bad engineering on the old Ford Pinto that made it like to burn up.

My guess is that if the Chinese cars are going to be sold in the USA, they'll need to be heavily scrutinized and perhaps altered in order to pass our safety regulations.

Comment Re:Screw the American auto industry (Score 1) 288

And you know this how?

Because it is a common trait among early adopters.

You know this how? I hear people saying that EV owners suffer buyers remorse.

But then again, we hear many things that ain't necessarily so.

What is more, Electric Vehicles have been around long enough that Early adopters are measured in decades now? Using the new generation of EV's not the over century old ones.

Comment Re:Screw the American auto industry (Score 1) 288

the product, fossil fuel cars, is obsolete...

I was singing a similar tune until this last winter, when a bunch of Teslas completely died due to the cold. People were pushing them down the street to get to charging stations. That showed me that fossil fuel vehicles are far from obsolete, and will continue to thrive until problems such as this are solved.

Isn't it weird how electrical vehicles are affected by cold, but petrofueld are completely unaffected by it?

Tents and gas flames https://www.youtube.com/watch?... Of course, you can always build a fire under it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

All sarcasm aside, gasoline and diesel engines also have problems in the cold. So if an EV does, it's because of the cold, not some inherent issue with EV's.

If people don't like EV's for some reason, that's fine. But just like the hand wringing when an EV catches fire, Petrofueld vehicles catch fire every day, and no one bats an eye. https://www.youtube.com/watch?... https://www.youtube.com/watch?... https://www.youtube.com/watch?... https://www.youtube.com/watch?... A lot of energy in batteries, and hella energy in petrofuels, and they get spunky every once in a while.P And a big part of the fix for both, rather than starting fires under the crankcase, is very similar in each case. Plug the thing in. In cold places like Alaska, parking meters have electrical outlets, battery and crankcase heaters, and you plug 'em in and keep them warm. An EV the same, you can even keep it topped off plugged into an outlet at home.

Comment Re:Police don't even need this (Score 1) 144

By definition a right against self-incrimination is a right to obstruct justice.

Only in very limited cases.
It is a right to not be compelled to "produce" testimony. It is not a right to not be compelled to produce evidence.
If the only evidence is your testimony, then you have a right to obstruct justice (assuming you really do have the evidence in your head)

If you are actually guilty of a crime, and the only evidence that will convict you is in your head, then by willfully withholding that evidence in your head you are actively obstructing justice.

That is absolutely true.

Future /. article: The Fifth Amendment ruled irrelevant by The Supreme Court after invention of computerized forced memory (insert....er) extraction device.

Yup. The Constitution was not a document that could see all ends.
It would not protect you from something that could reliably extract evidence from your brain.
Fortunately, it has a process for updating it. Whether we as a society would choose to do so or not is another question entirely.

Comment Re: Police don't even need this (Score 1) 144

I'd say yes.

It's physical evidence. It's the same as writing it down.
Would you deny law the right to collect things people had written down?

I'll grant you that you could have your legislatures pass laws protecting "brain dumps in readable media", but it's pretty absurd to think that the Constitution protects it.

Comment Re:Screw the American auto industry (Score 1) 288

How do you know that guy at the store doesn't pull a work trailer around the other 99.9999% of the time when you don't see him? Or haul a boat and put atvs in the back. Or haul loads of firewood.

We call those Mall Queens. It is exceptionally obvious with so many of these trucks. Because using a truck for work leaves evidence.

Even my Jeep, while I have it detailed regularly, bears evidence of it's use. Mud, the occasional scratch that needs buffed out.

Pristine trailer hitches, no scratches on the chrome, and beds without scratches or dents, either, on the mall queens.

Having the pickup is a statement of their patriotism, and it must be shiny and polished, pristine as their pure heart and fealty.

Comment Re:Screw the American auto industry (Score 2) 288

There's a few reasons but one side effect I've read about is that we are in a vehicle size arms race. People liked "being above the road" and Americans have always held "big car = safe" and so if you have a family and other people are driving 4 ton monsters you are also going to require a 4 ton monsters to feel safe.

Unfortunately the culture of America is weird sometimes and in my opinion we fail to realize peak utility in vehicles is in station wagons, minivans and Hilux trucks, all vehicles most Americans think are not "cool"

I was really pissed when they quit making Ford Ranger trucks in the US, and even the Chevy S-10, once a compact truck, got bloated. After coming back, they are a midsized truck now. Which means that they are what a F350 used to be, in general.

This happens so often to vehicles due to marketing in large part - the 'ers. Bigger faster, wider and so on.

You might add something like the normal Jeeps to that mix. Some places, like where I live have pretty wild swings in weather, and there's a reason that our roads are busy with them. A bog standard Jeep Compass or the quirky Renegade is pretty inexpensive by today's standards, and will handle the swings.

Comment Re:Screw the American auto industry (Score 1) 288

I'd never buy such a thing but for reasons I don't understand they are very popular and sell at a huge profit.

The traditional 4 door sedan otoh is passing from American auto history bit by bit, year by year.

I see those trucks and suvs all over the place being driven by people who clearly would be better off in a 4 door but fuck if I know why they buy the trucks and big suvs. My BIL has a big truck he spent 100k on and then another 30k or so having it customized with big tires, jacked up, blah blah blah. He doesn't do a damned thing with it he couldn't do in -any- other street legal vehicle. The other day I saw some old guy coming out of the supermarket parked next me put two small bags in the back of his huge pick up. I could have carried both bags by one finger. wtf? Really? Those two tiny bags didn't fit on the floor in the cab?

I just don't get why they do it but it's why the automakers build them. They sell big time.

For many, the Pick-um-up is a statement of patriotism. I kid you not. These folk find their expression of patriotism in that big pickup, and the prices have risen because of that. But there's trouble in the land of Jingo.

You can easily spend 150K on that shiny new thing.

It is a tad jarring to see someone in one of them who obviously doesn't spend much on clothing, grooming, or their teeth, hopping out of their 10 mpg pretend monster truck. Meanwhile, My Jeep Trailhawk version costs nowhere near as much, gets between 28 to 30 mpg fills up for a third of the cost - They obviously aren't the wealthiest demographic. And it goes places they can't. I even knew one guy some years back that had a daily driver of a Ford 350 with dually rears and a 5th wheel in the truck bed. He had no trailer, it was all patriotshow.

You'll see these truck parked outside of old junky mobile homes that were built a long time ago, and might be exhibiting proton decay at this point.

10 year loans is one of the ways they "afford" these things. My guess is they also use a credit card for every 140-200 dollar fill-up, depending on if it's gas or diesel. Low easy payments for the rest of their lives. Sorta. P But the prices have reached a point where the hillbilly struggles to make the payments on that 10 year mortgage, and what is the point of having a prtriotmobile for 10 years, when you need a new and bigger one every 4 years.

Slashdot Top Deals

Arithmetic is being able to count up to twenty without taking off your shoes. -- Mickey Mouse

Working...