Comment this is smart (Score 1) 20
Everyone who publishes that data is just providing free evidence. Why would they do that? Who knows, but this is smarter, and only slightly less scrupulous.
Everyone who publishes that data is just providing free evidence. Why would they do that? Who knows, but this is smarter, and only slightly less scrupulous.
They charge so much that it's literally cheaper to have a new part soldered to the board. They're fostering an industry dedicated to bypassing their ridiculous design decisions.
It took no skill, because you made no point. You just threw up and called it a meal.
"(who knew that biometrics wasn't a word? When did Mozilla decide this?)"
Most supplied dictionaries are trash, but yes, the Mozilla dictionary is especially horrible.
Even the Google dictionary is missing tons of words despite crowdsourcing (crowdsourcing being one of them, I just added it to my device) and even worse, the keyboard wants to type only banal words when you swipe, because the matches are apparently based more on crowdsourcing than on the best match for your swipe. The more erudite the word, the worse it is, for example try entering the word erudite. I succeeded on the second try, but the first time it typed "Russia" (and it was the first alternate suggestion the second time, too.)
"Apple is a wilful contributor to obeying the law, nothing more, nothing less."
Apple is a corporation, and like all corporations its explicit legal purpose is to separate funding from liability.
"I bet you'd sing a different tune if the ban was for TikTok."
China already has banned TikTok from China. They only allow their own version with approved thoughts and ideas. This move by China (and supported by Apple because nothing is more important to them than profit, even if it is unsustainable) is in fact just more of that same ban. As such, you would not only lose your bet, it really doesn't make any sense.
"We are obligated to follow the laws in the countries where we operate, even when we disagree," an Apple spokesperson said in a statement.
You're not obligated to operate in China, Apple spokesdroid. You chose to do so. Google chose to exit when China wanted them to help put the screws to the populace. Apple didn't. Apple is a willful contributor to public oppression in China and nothing any PR flack says will change that fact.
Is this 20 percent boost in CPU and IO-bound tasks really worth it when you lose a lot more performance in other key areas?
Most intensive tasks are I/O bound, and most of the ones that aren't are CPU-bound, so yes.
They want the photolitho machines. The location is also strategic.
also, like, you (as in you, drinkypoo) have been bitching about Mac OS X for as long as there's been Mac OS X, so this new talking point really just feels hollow.
I'm consistent so you don't believe me? Okay, sport.
haven't heard about time machine fuckups, do you have a link to anything other than the obligatory "mAKe sUre tHE cAbLe iS PLuggeD IN" page every company has?
Looks like they are showing the base clock for Windows and the boost clock for Linux. The processor model was listed on the page you linked, so you could have found this out with google.
The final conclusion, "Ubuntu
So what you're saying is you think Java is optimized for Linux over Windows? I could believe that, but where are your benchmark tests? How did you leave those out?
Why can't you append "-quora" to your query?
-site:quora.com still works.
I can't imagine a single reason why having them on the internet at all should be the norm.
It's cheaper, of course. There's no other reason.
People aren't addressing the fact that when the infrastructure goes under it will pollute and cause blockage to the coasts.
Yep. There's tons of highly polluted properties on coasts, including refineries, fuel depots, shipyards, storage yards... Even if you removed the buildings and whatnot completely the soil would still be contaminated. And then there's the nuclear plants... Over 40% of them are coastal worldwide, and that number rises to 66% if you count plants under construction.
He has not acquired a fortune; the fortune has acquired him. -- Bion