remember, above all else, the USA was from the start set up to make the rich richer.

James Madison, the designer of the federal constitution, wrote that the structure of the fed govt created by the constitution was to preserve wealth inequality by making it harder for the majority to control the govt.

Don't you love the constitution?

it's just word-salad and word-association stuff.

Kids and mulitculturalism is cool, man! What are you, a racist?

get with the program--multiculturalism is COOL and if you are against mass immigration you are a bigot and probably the next Hitler.

The fact that multiculturalism and mass immigration makes millionaire investors richer is just a coincidence. Just keep saying that....Just keep saying that....Just keep saying that....

and should be punished as such

the most exciting consequence of this is that mankind could possibly live forever under this scenario.

That means I personally could possibly live forever.

But of course the article does not mention that.

And of course I will be the only person on this thread mentioning this.

In fact I will be the only person in the world who will put that conclusion to words.

Why is that? Why are you animals all so pattern-bound, so stuck in your rut that you cannot speak ideas for which you have not been prepped?

if we could just get the robots to only fight other robots...

wishing I had mod points...

We have about 10 where I work. Dev team of about 200 overall. So they are a small percentage, but clearly not mythical.

A poorly defined plan is bad by definition. It doesn't meet the core requirements of 'plan'.

He requested a good solution. If you don't understand the obvious ways in which that won't work ...

Or even that using drones instead of soldiers kills less civilians. Care to guess how many civilians die if we have to invade Pakistan with the army instead of calling in a drone? The historical ratio for conventional military invasion is something like 100 times worse in terms of killing civilians.

I think your unstated assumption that this would increase empathy for the victims is mistaken. Higher realism in games has been on a pretty consistent trend of reducing empathy for the victims.

Than all other forms of combat. If we're going to kill terrrorists, there's no less civilian killing way to do it (currently).

Well, no, 'your property' is pretty much the opposite of 'public'.

Research studies.