Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter


Forgot your password?

Comment Re:Expensive (Score 2) 108

100 years ago companies were in business to actually build stuff. Sure they wanted to make money, but it was understood that you had to spend money to make money. Today, nobody has any interest in building anything that won't be insanely profitable right away.

Throwing money away on "app companies" that will never be profitable such as Uber, Snapchat, etc no problem at all. VCs never tire of wasting money on anything that attracts eyeballs, figuring that someday they can somehow monitize it. But building physical infrastructure, sorry that's too expensive!

Comment Re:I live in Orlando (Score 1) 455

No, that's not how it works. You interview for jobs requiring virtualization skills, and you tell them you have virtualization experience. You can talk the talk and answer any questions asked of you intelligently. That's all a modern tech interview is about nowdays anyhow: winning the quiz show. Your future employers don't know precisely what you did on the last job and don't really give a fuck anyway. Just so long as you fit their salary requirements and pass their quiz game in the interview.

I eagerly await the responses about that one guy who's new boss knew his old boss. They're the extreme exception, not the rule.

Comment Re:Gee (Score 1) 316

The problem is, you'd have to somehow implement the tax where it becomes effective world-wide all on the same day. Otherwise the first market to pass the tax will see a flight of trading activity to other markets that haven't yet implemented the tax.

Slashdot Top Deals

Prof: So the American government went to IBM to come up with a data encryption standard and they came up with ... Student: EBCDIC!"