Why in the world do you expect that lawmakers will be beholden to the laws they make?
It's a reasonable expectation in an unreasonable world.
Sorry, it's more important that we kill each other than understand our place in the universe. Have a good day.
Understanding our place in the universe doesn't cost billions of dollars. Just open the bible!
(not serious)
Either 0 or 1, depending on what I'm doing. Usually 0 but occasionally 1.
Protip: Always write to a singular audience. If you want to pluralize the audience, use first-person ("How many of us...?").
If it costs us a mere 1-2% of our GDP each year to prevent that change, over the course of 100 years that adds up: Current World GDP (About 64 Trillion USD) * 1.02 ^ 100 = $ 460 Trillion Dollars
wat
That does not add up.
Try 0.01 * $64T * 100 = $64T. Or $128T for 2%.
A felony conviction amongst other things would invalidate them from public service ever again.
[citation needed]
Here's a counter-citation for you:
"As a result, according to the Congressional Research Service, committing a crime cannot constitutionally disqualify someone from serving in Congress. And the state has no say in determining whether or not someone is qualified to serve in the House or Senate:
"... Once a person meets the three constitutional qualifications of age, citizenship and inhabitancy in the State when elected, that person, if duly elected, is constitutionally âoequalifiedâ to serve in Congress, even if a convicted felon."
Or are you proposing a Constitutional amendment to prohibit felons from public service?
The NY ACLU is only suing them over the database. Not the practice.
And all the public angst and hand-wringing seems to be about the "racial profiling" aspect, as if this crap would be A-OK if only they did it to white people too.
A true WTF.
The more paranoid among you are probably preparing a rant about how this is $BIG_EVIL_CONGLOMERATE's wet dream, and something something 1984 something something DRM something from my cold dead hands. But that's not the case. Even *if* you posit a dystopian future where the $BEC controls everything, there will *still* be PCs, because *someone* will still have to produce data. They may become much less common, but a PC, or a PC-functional device, *will* be necessary.
In the post-PC dystopia, content will be produced only by $BEC and its licensees, on expensive workstations taxed and regulated by sprawling government agencies. Naturally developers and their equipment must be registered and tracked, with frequent inspections and audits -- these people and tools are capable of creating VIRUSES!!! and doing PIRACY!!! TERRORISM!!!
He has not acquired a fortune; the fortune has acquired him. -- Bion