Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Hollywood airheads (Score 1) 21

How does Gibson's "Passion of the Christ" square with your theory, then?
Blatantly Christian flick does well. So there is clearly money to be made. Yet there is both a vacuum of capitalism on the Hollywood end, and, back to my original point, not much going on from the "Precambrian effluent" side of things, if I understood your term correctly.

Comment Re:I don't get it (Score 1) 212

No need to wait for a TCP connection to time out. As soon as the page has finished loading, all connections are closed. HTTP is a stateless protocol; just because you have a web page open in front of you doesn't mean there's any connection to the server right now.

If you're not using cookies, you can use query strings to track state. For every link on the page, you add a query string to the URL containing a session ID number, so when the user clicks any link, the session ID is passed in the query string. But that looks ugly, so you should just use cookies.

Comment Re:Premium not enough? (Score 1) 274

Overreach your ability and fail spectacularly and your career is over. Same for everybody

Until you move to a new market, don't mention the old failures, and try again. With that nice union vouching for your supposed competence, you can't not be hired.

Executives that make major failures can't hide in obscurity. A string of two or three failures is the end of their career as an executive, and they'll have to be coasting on that golden parachute through retirement... Working in finance, I've actually seen a few clients in exactly that situation. They're unemployable as executives because their last few ventures failed, and they're now working low-level management jobs trying to cover the ongoing expenses they have from their earlier lifestyle.

I'm not saying they deserve a 300x salary, or even 50x, but just that the higher the rank, the more the risk of failure becomes personal.

Then that's a clear-cut management failure. The same as if they negotiated exclusive contracts with a materials supplier without having any escape clause in case of abuse.

Exclusive contracts are par for the union course. Most unions forbid their members from working in non-union shops without special arrangement, so a company must either deal with the union or hire all non-union employees... but the non-union hiring pool is pretty shallow indeed, since most places are exclusive union shops. It's a chicken-or-egg problem, and once a particular labor market has joined exclusive unions, there's no course for return to a non-union market. So much for that level playing field.

This is the big issue behind the "right to work" laws that force separation between employment eligibility and union membership. Ideally, employees could get offers from employers, and perhaps have different (maybe better) offers if they're union members. The employee gets to pick what's best for their situation, so rather than an adversarial power struggle, the employers and unions compete to have control over the employees, inflating conditions steadily over time.

Slashdot Top Deals

So you think that money is the root of all evil. Have you ever asked what is the root of money? -- Ayn Rand

Working...