Let me be the snarky cynic. I think there is a bias by the tree huggers. Take nuclear as an example, no way we shall never use that. Well it does solve the climate change problem. But then the radiation if shit hits the ceiling argument comes around. Ok, but how come the world has not heard about this guy?
https://www.goodnewsnetwork.or...
He is making it feasible to clean up radioactivity. That is awesome, yet do we hear about it? This is where my snarky cynic barbs are raised. What if there was a down deep bias and not about climate change?
Next example, city people in Europe are starting to complain that there are too many big electric vehicle SUV's driving in the city. Huh, heh, what? I thought they did not want fossil fuel power vehicles? The goal posts have moved and the real fight was not climate change, but cars.
Do you see where I am going here? I am not a climate change denier, oh climate change is real! However I am seeing that as we begin to shift the tree huggers are only happy if we do things their way! Heaven forbid we do something else, like Carbon Capture. No we must not do that at all!
BTW here is the irony. As Germany protests nuclear, they are shutting down their last station only to extend and power up other fossil fuel stations because they don't have enough electricity. It really and truly is a WTF moment.
Thus this vice article and its premise, not going to believe it as vice has drank too much koolaid.