Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re: Visualization of how large NGC 1277 (Score 3, Informative) 65

Well yes if you use the size of the event horizon and the mass of the black hole to calculate density then you get a low density.

But the mass is not distributed over that volume. inside the black hole the mass is actually contained in an infintesimal point, and the density is infinite. At least according to the math; it's impossible to look inside the event horizon to find out if that's really the case.

At the very least it's clear that a black hole must have density significantly higher than that of a neutron star. Saying it's less dense than the air is misleading in that respect.

Comment Re:Bios flashed spyware? (Score 2) 346

You can generally reliably remove rootkits by taking the drive out, putting it into an external drive bay (so its not present on a PC while booting), connect the drive when your PC is started up and then format it with none of its code executing.

Why go through that much trouble?

Just stick a bootable optical disk with formatting tools on it in, boot from it, and then format the infected drive. No code from the drive will be running so any rootkit on the drive will be overwritten.

I don't know how the Windows setup disk works, but I find it hard to believe it'd start running the kernel that's on the disk drive that you want to format. Certainly a Linux install disk would work just fine.

A BIOS rootkit would be a different kettle of fish.

Comment Re:You are not Nintendo's target market (Score 1) 173

Anecdotes are not data.

Sure they are! Just not a lot of data. All we need now is for you two to rigorously define the number of friends and their movements, and then get a couple hundred more people randomly sampled from the population to do the same and we'll have the basis for a solid study!

Comment Re:What, what? This doesn't make sense. (Score 1) 412

The problem is sea ice has nothing to do with sea level - it floats.

It has something to do with it since when it melts it's basically fresh water which will decrease the ocean salinity which affects how it expands with temperature (plus other effects). I'm guessing a second-order effect at best, but I don't know.

Comment slideshow pictures for non-working browsers: (Score 3, Informative) 206

Comment Re:Every artist adds own take (Score 1) 376

It's Lucas' influence by Kurosawa, and his influence on just about every film-maker in existence, that people see.

The most influential artist is not the one who made by some measure more of a cultural impact than the hundreds of others artists who also had cultural impacts. It's the artist that inspired them all.

The impact of Kurosawa on our culture is not direct, but both dwarfs and subsumes that of Lucas.

Comment Re:Why hope? (Score 1) 155

which implies that it once was a star which burned off its mass.

It doesn't imply that. Brown dwarfs were never stars. Fusion may occur, but not in a sustained fashion like in a star. The rate of fusion will just drop and drop along with the temperature of the brown dwarf. Stars on the other hand maintain a more-or-less steady rate of fusion for millions or billions of years.

What's interesting is that the smaller a star is the longer it lasts, and the least of the actual stars, the red dwarfs, are expected to be burning their hydrogen fuel for trillions of years, so the universe isn't close to old enough for any of them to have ceased fusing. Making a stark contrast between the least of stars, and the greatest of brown dwarfs.

Comment Re:Why hope? (Score 2) 155

Use of the term evolution in that context, but it's not terribly inaccurate.

If you accept that part of the evolution of a star is the process of accreting enough material to reach the minimal stellar mass, then it's accurate to say that a brown dwarf got farther along that path than a planet before it stopped. And yes "evolution" is the correct term in this context.

'Failed star' As if it tried, but just couldn't pull it off.

Exactly right. It accreted mass from a cloud of gas and dust and got pretty big, but just couldn't collect enough for whatever reason to sustain fusion and become a star. A "failed star". It's poetic, but accurate. Even Jupiter is sometimes described this way.

A decent article shouldn't call something a Brown Dwarf star and define it to be a 'star' which failed to achieve fusion. If it failed to achieve fusion, then it isn't a star, but ... a planet ;)

They don't call it a "Brown Dwarf star", they call it a Brown Dwarf, because "Brown Dwarf star" is not a thing since Brown Dwarfs are by definition sub-stellar objects. They may undergo some fusion, but not sustained fusion and so will steadily cool over their lifetime, unlike a star. Other differences are that a brown dwarf will be fully convective with no chemical differentiation by depth, unlike a star.

The line between brown dwarf and planet is fuzzy, and not dependent on the presence or absence of fusion at any point. Very large gas giants -- perhaps even Jupiter -- could have had some fusion occur.

So the correct nitpick would be that they didn't say "sustained fusion", implying that fusion never occurred.

A brown dwarf which isn't fusing anymore isn't a 'failed to become a star' star, but a star which has ceased fusion.

No, a brown dwarf which isn't fusing anymore is a brown dwarf, which is a "failed to become a star".

Not hot enough to be a white dwarf, and cooling to become a black dwarf.

A white dwarf is not a really hot brown dwarf and a black dwarf is not a really cool brown dwarf. A white dwarf is the remnant of a Main Sequence star that wasn't big enough to form a neutron star after its fusion-burning life is over. It's electron-degenerate matter. A black dwarf is a what white dwarfs will eventually become in something like 10^15 years when they finish cooling.

A White dwarf or black dwarfs is a has-been.

A Brown dwarfs is a never-was.

Comment Re:too primitive for my tastes.. (Score 1) 155

The first image and spectrograph from the Very Large Telescope Array of the possible nethack planet shows what scientists say appears to be "a purple lower-case 'h'".

"It may just be a type of dwarf," the lead scientist on the project said, "and it does not appear to be heading towards us. There's no reason to be alarmed."

In related news the head of NIS was forced to resign yesterday, when in the aftermath of this discovery he advocated the development of Scroll of Genocide technology "as a necessary and prudent precaution."

Slashdot Top Deals

If you have a procedure with 10 parameters, you probably missed some.

Working...