It is not per-cell (at that weight it would be a much more notable breakthrough if it was).
So assuming the screen, backlight, memory, and SSD use no power at all. Then you can use 15% of your CPU/GPU for 14 hours - yay marketing!
In fact the USB 3 charging port alone would drain the main and external batteries in 9 hours with the laptop in full sleep.

All times mentioned in BBC articles (unless clearly stated) are in British local time, therefore this is the most useful clock for them to display.
Few non-British people are going to want to set there clock by the BBC; however many people read a new story that 'XYZ happened this morning', and it would be very useful to see how long ago that was.

Given that the vast majority of computers already display their time on the screen; it is reasonable to assume the only the purpose of an additional clock on the BBC website is to validate its accuracy.
n.b. a large proportion of the population grew up setting their watches to the BBC's pips, it is also natural to consider them an authority on the subject.

If by workplace you mean 'Office' then they certainly will have a stronghold for many years. For the majority of the worlds population who don't work at a desk, desktops (even laptops require sitting down) seem unlikely to remain the best solution.
Gaming has a long history of toppling people with larger majority shares then Microsoft. The best way to think about the Xbox One that it currently has 0% market share, Microsoft have a lot of money and experience to change that, but so do other companies.

It is very unlikely you will need 'accurate' stats. though.

They are probably hoping the extra data will help incriminate other people. Hence why the 5th no longer applies.

Really don't want to contribute to the negativity around an admirable idea. However you need to be aware of the horribly complex visa and tax laws.

The UK has a a growing number of good hackspaces, you would be welcome at Reading http://rlab.org.uk/

The first person to encourage independent confirmation of a published cold-fusion device becomes the person who has made the greatest contribution to the betterment of the human condition in all of history.
People who think they can make more money by preventing a section of humanity from using a cold-fusion device are too small minded and petty to stand any chance of having inventing one.

Yes that wraps it up nicely. The sad thing is I find the less doctored photo looks much better.

If the people who had designed IP6 had just fixed the actual issue and not bolted on stuff nobody needed; we would have been done in the last millennium, and saved a LOT of money.

ARM SoCs are developing incredibly fast. They are 12 months from obliterating current gen consoles (Tegra 5s will have Kepler GPUs). 2-3 years is much less certain, but current road-maps show them easily beating next-gen consoles.
I certainly agree that tablets generally aren't heavily used, and that this dose indicate they are probably in a bubble. I was just claiming that if they where being used, then the replacement cycle would sustain the market without needed an upgrade cycle.

The batteries are sufficient designed obsolescences to prevent that from happening. A heavily used tablet has 1 year possibly 18 months before it is just a digital picture frame.
This years round of consoles is also going to raise the graphics bar substantially, tablets are 2 to 3 years from matching this.

Apart from the stacked CPU/RAM, the Raspberry PI could be sold as an assemble it yourself kit. All the key components are still produced in Asia, and will be for decades unless Wales wants to invest high-billions in new fabs.

We are all frustrated by Apple at one time or another, but that don't justify spreading ridiculous FUD.
Apple has more cash then ANYONE IN HISTORY; security their supply lines is hardly going to be difficult.

That is precisely the problem. You could require that the doctor can only see your medical records in special bunker under the Pentagon, after he has submitted to a full cavity search and provided 20 forms of ID. It doesn't have any bearing on whether the next day he phones up his friendly drugs rep. to say he has an interesting new case. If you share information with someone it have to TRUST them to use it wisely, the is no technology that will help with that.
Sending records securely over the public Internet is a solved problem and most people manage to do this every day. Storing records securely is also solved, though this is less uniformly applied. Trying to give people information (digital or otherwise) and then controlling precisely what they do with that information is quite simply impossible.