PaulS wrote: - The first Digsby blog post about the research module was two weeks after someone first noticed the module working. Why were people not informed *before* the module was in place? - Who on the digsby development team, specifically, suggested that an unannounced enabled-by-default research module which ran in the background would be a good idea?
Aaron (Digsby Developer) wrote: A bad management decision. I'm not going to name names, it's not my place, and we did apologies for that. The reasoning was they wanted to test it without giving other IM clients the same idea. It was a bad decision, and we know that.
I think they should include a printer as well, one which prints out money!
Sorry, that's server-side functionality only.
It's just like I say with sex... I may not be good, but at least I'm fast.
and like Microsoft, we'd prefer if it were bug free.
Software production is assumed to be a line function, but it is run like a staff function. -- Paul Licker