An anonymous reader writes: One of the most disturbing trends that keep on being discussed on Slashdot are EULA (End User Licensing Agreements), in which End Users after they have bought and paid for their products and fully discharged their end of their agreements say by purchasing a copy of Windows, is forced to give up all their rights as well as their first born — AFTER THE FACT that the Contract has been fully discharged. (A clear cut violation of the Doctrine of First Sale) What a novel concept that you can force people to surrender their rights by throwing on terms after you got their hands on the money. So why not take this logical evolution of contract law to the next level, and do a "Reverse EULA". You go out and buy your Windows/OS X/Treo/whatever, and then send them a letter setting up terms on how they can spend the money you exchanged for their product AFTER THE FACT. If they don't agree to spend the money the way you demand, they have to return it immediately for a refund of their product. If they keep the money, they agree, because as we all know EULA's are enforceable by consent of use. If they object, well too bad, our EULA is every bit as fair as yours.
(Yah I know turn about is fair play, but I am sure this is too fair for the legal community out there)