lots of women simply DON'T WANT IT.

ffs what are we supposed to do, grab them by the hair and drag them in kicking and screaming?

for a smart guy, cook is a fucking idiot.

talk about shooting yourself in the foot. there should be a separate license for people who reserve the right to sabotage their code. but open source, released to the public and worked on with others shouldn't be allowed to be deliberately undermined by a malicious individual, even if it's the creator. there should be a "it's my ball and i'm going home" license for the cunts who need to reserve that right for themselves.

...to see how they fuck this up.

narcs!

make me... say.... 20 blocks of bullion. chop chop.

they're meeting the demand that exists. if we have the ability to meet the need with renewables right now at the same price, fucking do it already. if not what can you possibly do but stfu? unless you want poor people to freeze to death.

but whatever the race, i want the perps arrested and prosecuted and kept off our streets. and if the perps are black brown yellow or purple, the fucking trash has to be taken out without color being an EXCUSE ffs.

how else are they going to learn about drugs and firearms?

we didn't always have jpeg or whatever nasa uses. they used to have to dump the film from orbit and catch that midair too....

can't come soon enough.

if companies are pulling out for the intent of harming the country, what obligation does the country have to the companies? it's basic tit for tat.

of course, it means that they're burning a helluva lot of bridges. but considering that it's unlikely that russia is going to get on friendly terms with the west for the foreseeable future... from russia's perspective - why not?

or release it into the public domain?

wouldn't your stance cover anyone sabotaging any kind of code on the grounds of free speech?

so if someone working at boeing reprogrammed a system of a 747 and caused it to crash into the atlantic on its next take off as protest against boeing's military contracts or somesuch, wouldn't that be defensible as free speech then?

it seems the "throwing of the rock" is the speech. if you hit someone - that is, cause real world harm - that is the indefensible thing.

even with speech, it's not a free for all. you are not allowed to lie under oath. you are not allowed to incite violence. you are not allowed to yell fire in a crowded movie theater.

and it seems sabotaging code here has indeed caused real world harm and damage.

budum-cha.

and this is the fault of the youth obsessed elders for ceding to hysterical children.

pathetic.