Comment Re:You're a company (Score 1) 430
BUT YOURE NOT "ultimately taxing people". THAT's THE GP's POINT!
BUT YOURE NOT "ultimately taxing people". THAT's THE GP's POINT!
a seed used for food is not a *viable* seed. I don't see your point.
you can't. WE can. that's always been the formula.
oh yes, I see, so you have no confidence of joining one of these institutions and making them better -- you can't conceive of anyone like you doing it, either. They sure could use people like you, couldn't they? People who care? But you'd rather post how little anyone cares (a flawed supposition), then fail to post how little you care in return.
That's not any answer worth +5.
so no further answer? i
Psst hey, nyquist called and wanted to ask you, what's the frequency, kenneth?
(really, if anyone wants to enlighten me as to why their technique of de-apoizing
nice to know, my gf uses fortran for modelling so i know it's serious but i would have bet much it was 0-based. can you help a bit more, and give me your opinion as to why 1-based languages make any sense, at all? I know it's a simple policy choice, but it makes as much sense as starting at the letter 'b' (with the 'a' at the end, not omitted) when reciting the alphabet. I consider myself above average in programming and can't see it; what value does it give that the lack of standardization doesn't take away? (pre)Thanks!---
anything even remotely serious will have zero-based arrays; java falls under the 'serious' category (perhaps too serious, but i'm a dynamic type of guy)
They did that for us in elementary school, escorted us through juvenile as a field trip, even showed off the taser (circa 1991?) for us.
Now when i think back, i am only reminded that real monsters exist, and we encourage whole towns to get into sadistic torture.
Fight war with love, asshole. (so long as it's tough love. You
(as i wrote above).sleep is incredibly important, and we did NOT evolve to sleep as little as possible on a rigid basis How much must I yell it? Our bodies have varying requirements as they react and adjust to the insults life inflicts (or we do). To think waking and rising each day at the same time (if you even can without modern drugs!) is healthy is about as smart as refusing to breathe deeply when you run and I
(un-fat / remote programming consultant / sleeps 10hr a day / skips on TV / and like to stand occasionally when working and my desk "rises to the occasion".)
I don't think your advice is consistent with this article; sleep is incredibly important, and we did NOT evolve to sleep as little as possible on a rigid basis. Our bodies have varying requirements as they react and adjust to the insults life inflicts (or we do). To think waking and rising each day at the same time (if you even can without modern drugs!) is healthy is about as smart as refusing to breathe deeply when you run.
I hate the typical corporate america attitude for just for this life-shortening idiocy. I won't die for it.
or people who are making a comment, cooking spaghetti, talking on the phone, and DONT LIVE THEIR/THERE LIFE to get A+ in syntax from YOU.
give it up.
icebike, Tell us who you work for, and you represent, before you shit all over this thread any more!
In soviet russia, the conference center will target YOU, from their terrace!
The top right connector is different; any idea why this is? I also have cables that look like that, and in a moment of lazy weakness and a lack of initial comment would love it if someone cleared that up for us?
UNIX was not designed to stop you from doing stupid things, because that would also stop you from doing clever things. -- Doug Gwyn