Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Hmmm...... Border Patrol too????? (Score 1) 156

Maybe coincidence, maybe not. I happened to be crossing the border back into the U.S. from Niagara Falls on Thursday afternoon when the Customs and Border Patrol computers at the entry port started to randomly shut down. It took over two hours of waiting for them to finally call the ATF to run our passports. Lo and behold, the FBI system was their backup! This is the side-effect of inter-agency connectivity: if you CAN successfully launch an attack, you can take down EVERYBODY.

Comment Re:Why would an intelligent lifeform get violent? (Score 1) 344

But these examples are hard-wired (or -coded) responses to specific stimuli/criteria. The entire Terminator premise is that the AI is able to extrapolate from specific situations to a general situation (i.e. all humans without a "friend" transponder/RFID/etc. who are behaving in a specific way are a threat, to ALL humans are a threat). I'm not a roboticist, but it seems to me that this leap of "logic" is not at all inevitable.
Role Playing (Games)

Submission + - The Life of a Chinese Gold Farmer

jellie writes: "The New York Times Magazine has a story about real-money trading in massively multiplayer online games titled "The Life of a Chinese Gold Farmer". The author provides some background of the practice and interviews several players. To describe the scale of the virtual-money industry, the author mentions a 2001 paper by an economist from the University of Indiana: "Updated and more broadly applied, Castronova's results [based on his paper from 2001] suggest an aggregate gross domestic product for today's virtual economies of anywhere from $7 billion to $12 billion, a range that puts the economic output of the online gamer population in the company of Bolivia's, Albania's and Nepal's.""
Patents

Submission + - USPTO Calls BS on 1-Click Patent Claims

theodp writes: "Seeking to extend the reach of CEO Jeff Bezos' 1-Click patent, Amazon ran into a very unimpressed USPTO examiner who rejected all 75 of the e-tailer's new claims, repeatedly invoking terms like 'obvious' and 'old and well known' to dismiss the purported inventions. Amazon has taken the unusual step of requesting an Oral Appeal to plead its case and also canceled and refiled its 1-Click claims in a continuation application, not unlike a popular stalling tactic employed by skilled lawyers. As it touted the novelty of 1-Click to Congress (PDF) last fall, Amazon didn't mention the examiner's rejection as it insisted that 'still no [1-Click] prior art has surfaced' to a Committee whose members included Rick Boucher (VA) and Howard Berman (CA), recipients of campaign contributions from a PAC funded by Amazon execs and their families."

Slashdot Top Deals

Arithmetic is being able to count up to twenty without taking off your shoes. -- Mickey Mouse

Working...