Comment Re: Now, if... (Score 1) 280
I'd encourage anyone who hasn't tried OpenBSD to try it. Yes, Theo is a hard to love character, but don't let that get in your way.
This risk, being a known mole is too high for a "real" spy. If I were a spy agency, I wouldn't risk any assets for such a short term gain. Once exposed, a mole will have no trustworthiness AND all associations would likely become suspect.
And the solution to that problem is easy. Money. Well money and indirection.
Most people can be bought for a price and they don't have to know it's the NSA doing the buying, it could be a terrorist group or something more benign. All that matters is there is not direct link between the code submitter and NSA. Heck, the submitter can claim the NSA made him/her do it as long as they come off as a crazy person (which they will with no direct proof.. "well this person paid me to submit this code, no they didn't say they were from the NSA.. BUT THEY HAD TO BE, I'M CERTAIN!"). Bonus points for finding some tinfoil hat wearing neckbeard that can be bought. If it ever hits the media it'll be short lived and humorous, "Crazy basement dweller claims NSA made him do it! Needed money for rare Star Wars collectibles."
I'm of course playing devil's advocate here. I think it's smarter to find holes in the existing implementation, especially one that has been audited as safe.
"Can't win in a court of law" doesn't fix the injuries the driver of the car that is rear ended suffered.
This. This. A million times this.
People who have never been in at least a relatively serious accident don't understand this. Even a "minor" accident (which on the radio they would announce as no serious injuries) can end up being years worth of suffering for the victim. Being in the clear legally just means you will eventually get money to cover your expenses and a little extra for "pain and suffering" (non-pecuniary).
I was in an accident, not my fault. Did everything possible to avoid it (but when you are between a concrete barrier and an elderly driver that doesn't notice your horn there aren't many options.. it's just how fast you are going to hit them or the concrete). If it was possible to pay whatever I get out of the accident to not have had it in the first place I do that in a second.
In driving class I was taught to hit the small animal if it wasn't possible to safely avoid it (don't swerve if there's oncoming traffic or a bike, don't slam the brakes if someone is tailing you etc). It didn't really truly hit me until I was in an accident. You do not want to be in a collision if you can avoid it. A small cute and furry is worth that cost (and if it's someone's pet they shouldn't have been in the road in the first place.. if that helps you rationalize it). Even a relatively minor accident can put your life on hold for months. I only had a broken arm (bit of a major problem as someone that codes for a living). It took me a few months to get back up to working full time and more than a year later I'm still having issues (possible ligament issue) and no where near settling the case. My wife was out of work more than a month as well. Luckily we are scraping by month to month.
I've been rear ended a few times and generally it's not too bad (month of pain or so), but they can be bad too and much harder to argue if you only have soft tissue damage. It's just easier to not get hit.
Why is it that you retards cannot understand that "selling to a small, but highly profitable segment of the market" is a perfectly viable business model?
Targeting a luxury (or mid luxury / high end?) segment is a perfectly legitimate model. It works for BMW, Rolex, Gucci, Bowers & Wilkins etc. The problem for Apple is that as a luxury or high end producer of tech goods is being aesthetically pleasing and having brand recognition isn't enough. They have to innovate to stay in their position. Other luxury companies have to compete on performance (I'm sure the BMW R&D budget is huge) and often they do cutting edge, but it isn't really the same as the tech arena where things move very quickly and even small companies can compete. If Apple can't continue to innovate they are going to find themselves in the awkward position they were in during the 90s (prior to Steve's return). They were hemorrhaging money on failed projects (how much did they spend on Pink?), their processors were falling behind the competition, their OS was getting long in the tooth and they were still attempting to charge a premium for their products.
That being said, Apple has a LOT of money and a huge cult following. At worst there is going to be some attrition in their market share, but even that's doubtful as they can sell their existing products into new markets to keep revenues up. Apple dying would be a very slow death (unless they make really huge mistakes consecutively and continuously).
Saliva causes cancer, but only if swallowed in small amounts over a long period of time. -- George Carlin