I wonder what experts in other areas are complaining about.
It can't be just this one area they get wrong.
Hi,
So, it is tempting to resurrect Technocrat.net now that Slashdot stinks worse than the last two times I shut down technocrat.net
If you remember, we didn't get very many readers. We didn't get them because not enough people submitted usable articles.
As it happens, we don't just need a better Slashdot. We need a replacement for Groklaw. And I personally would be happier reading something with the absolute minimum of Javascript except perhaps in the submission editor. Maybe I'm old-fashioned.
I know that I can do it technically, and I have the server, and Cloudflare should be able to help me handle the load. But if it is like last time, and my wife observes that I'm talking to the same dozen guys all of the time, it's not going to work.
What do you think?
Is it social bias or is it just the way things are? Building toys that boys like and marketing them to boys isn't "social bias." Same things with toys for girls. The whole bullshit about "social bias" is that boys and girls are equal in every way and think, act, and prefer in the exact same way until "society" forces blue on boys and pink on girls. Total bullshit.
"Smith!" screamed the shrewish voice from the telescreen. "6079 Smith W.! Yes, YOU! Bend lower, please! You can do better than that. You’re not trying. Lower, please! THAT’S better, comrade."
Stop forcing shit and let the person choose what he or she wants.
Just common sense. Don't bet big on daily doubles if you don't know the subject. Hit the big numbers first. I'm always stunned when two contestants are $4k back and they keep picking the $200 questions.
You're really quite late to the party, troll. People had suggested quite some time ago that Pudge was a script. Hell I accused him directly of being a script last January. Granted I called him "Pudge-script" rather than PudgeScript but nonetheless the idea is not new to this year.
The thing is that you don't criticize me when you accuse me of being a script. Predictability in argument is generally a virute, as far as I am concerned. If you lie, I point it out. If you make a reasonable argument, I respond to it (as I have in the past, though rarely; even though you consistently lie and say I never do). And you're predictable too: not only will you lie often, but you will never, ever, ever even attempt to back up your lies about me.
So yes, please continue to point out that I predictably call you a liar when you lie. I am unbothered by this.
This time you started off by accusing me of lying.
That time you started off by lying. What's your point?
"Ninety percent of baseball is half mental." -- Yogi Berra