Comment Re:Worry about the infrastructure going underwater (Score 1) 62
I wouldn't bank on it happening. If China has proven anything, it's that it's good at infrastructure programmes.
I wouldn't bank on it happening. If China has proven anything, it's that it's good at infrastructure programmes.
Oddly enough, the US population is expected to decline by about the same amount... If you exclude immigration, which is what they seem to have done for China.
https://www.census.gov/newsroo...
They are assuming that nothing much will change in China, but that seems unlikely. If the government was willing to have a one child policy, encouraging children should be no big deal.
Do they have a separate TikTok app in China because the law requires it, or because Western nations would be even more unhappy if the networks weren't separated?
Probably a bit of both.
Companies with that attitude aren't good to work for I avoid them. If I worked for Google I'd have left once the early days were over and it went corporate.
So take your pick. Be ethical and address employee concerns, or have more staff turnover and the good people with options leaving.
I use both Windows and Linux. Linux is not some wonderful OS where everything just works. It's got plenty of its own problems and annoyances.
Okay, it doesn't spy on you out of the box, but if you can install Linux you can use Rufus and a few simple tools to disable all that crap on Windows too. With WSL you can run a lot of Linux stuff too.
Pick you poison.
Revenge porn too. Pornhub has already been in trouble for that, the result of which was deleting all user uploaded material and starting over.
It's not binary. The bigger the site the more responsibility. Sites that carry particularly risky material like porn have additional requirements, from the basic age checks in performers upwards.
Try holding the power button down. You should get a menu, if not you can probably change it to the menu in the shortcut key settings.
One option is "lockdown" on most devices.
The Fourth Amendment is more relevant here and was part of the rulings I read about decades ago on these matters. Fingerprints were totally fair game before computers; no court order required and DNA shouldn't require one (but does if taken off your person while taking a fingerprint off your person is different.)
Understanding is always the understanding of a smaller problem in relation to a bigger problem. -- P.D. Ouspensky