most travel experts strongly recommend insurance for any trip
And most "insurance salesmen" are liars masquerading as "experts" =P Insurance is a great thing to have in any situation, but you don't need travel-specific insurance in order to be covered when traveling, like many supposed "experts" will recommend. Check your homeowner's or renter's insurance, and it probably covers any of your property, whenever it's with you, regardless of who breaks it or how or why. If it doesn't cover that, call up the company and increase your coverage until it does, even if you have to decrease the total dollar amount of coverage (your house is much less likely to burn down than your laptop is to be broken by someone). It'll be way cheaper than buying a whole extra insurance policy, for sure. If the company you use doesn't offer that kind of coverage -- SWITCH, because they're useless, and will never pay you because they can almost always claim your situation was excluded.
What kind of application requires real-time computing without a video output?
Shoutcast server (streaming audio) would rock, but streaming video would also be cool, web/net/file server...
Node in a beowulf cluster, computing... anything! Game simulator, fractal renderings, the weather, physics simulations, neural network simulation, circuit simulation, gene sequencing, stock market analysis... some combination of those things...
I'd like to remind anyone who's never been inside an actual compute center that usually only the head nodes, like 2-5 machines for every hundred or so compute nodes, have displays, and the sole purpose of the compute nodes is loads of real-time computing... else why do you think we'd (taxpayers) spend millions of dollars on these compute centers? Obviously, the need to compute (the application) came before the need to display (the video output). How strange that these needs have become so closely marketed as inseparable, that you, the slashdot commenter, can't think of a world where they aren't.
While there is still hope for computing in the cloud, it's hard not to wonder if short-term profits, a lack of architectural thinking about security and resilience, and long-term myopia aren't leading us in the wrong direction.
What? Of course those aren't leading us in the wrong direction --- they aren't LEADING anywhere! Science still LEADS technology development, and Slashdot has even run multiple stories about the Open Science Grid. OSG, of course, is just ONE huge example of a set of massively distributed parallel services, spanning multiple organizations and institutions across the country, and peering with other grids across the world! Funding for grid development is completely unmatched in computing projects, given that it happens in so damn many places, and yet the need for faster and better performance (with a complete disregard for profits) drives scientists to find the cheapest and most efficient means of squeezing performance from hardware. It's a VERY active field of research (I happen to work in it)! The grid doesn't only offer compute cycles, it has storage and other services too, and cross-compatibility is a major concern. It really all MUST work together in order to be effective!
As scientists iron out bugs with this stuff, and as their students leave into the workforce, the technology slowly leaks into companies, most of which move at molasses-speed to adopt new ideas. Seriously, when *I* left this field 5 years ago, no one knew what the hell I was talking about when I talked at interviews about my work in "distributed computing" or "parallel processing", forget mentioning "grid" or "clouds". I gave up on jobs after a couple of years and came back to research, but it was just THIS PAST YEAR that any major companies noticed those catch words on my resume. Seriously, it takes a long while for them to catch up to development.
So, in short, it isn't myopia of thinking that's making cloud computing drive itself to the ground, it's the myopia of this article that makes it look that way.
Nor are popular bands popular just because they're signed to major labels (otherwise Poe one of my favorite artists would be considerably better known than she is).
What? Poe was extremely popular when she first showed up on the major label music scene in the 90's. Of course artists become popular just because they're signed to major labels; the labels to all the legwork for targeted marketing and distribution. Surely you thought of this direct effect?
They are popular because major labels and other soul crushing pieces of media machinery market them heavily through all the things that people are connected to. Television shows, movies, radio, the blogosphere, etc.
Hmm... it appears you did think of it, Mr. Self-contradiction. So, uh, what was it your argument was about?
If you only ever use a browser and office apps on your work computer, and run anti-malware utils regularly, you're not likely to run into these problems. If, on the other hand, you used a chat client that created an independent log file for everyone you ever talked to in a chat room, and like to download sparkly new cursors and screensavers all the damn time, you might find yourself needing a reinstall pretty quickly.
You knew the job was dangerous when you took it, Fred. -- Superchicken