It is an avoidable risk, in that we can tell idiotic humans to stop flying quadcopters near planes, you fools!
Oh, just tell them to stop and that will solve the problem. How little some people know of human nature.
Yes both "PC loser" and "SJW" are ad hominem but they're insults not arguments. An ad hominem attack is a response to a person based on them rather than the content of their argument. This was not a response to his argument, please note he's the one that started throwing insults around.
Your claim of "Tu Quoque" is also wrong, I objected to him telling everybody who disagreed with him not not say anything "ever", but never suggested in my response that he should remain silent.
On a personal note: the "no you are!" defence? Really? I haven't seen heard that since I was six. What a pitiful attempt at rational argument.
That's the card I used to use for business expenses. Claim it back from the company and pocket the 1.5%. I've changed jobs and no longer use expenses much so I cut the card up.
Just as an aside - it's also worth joining hotel "clubs" and picking up free weekends away which are untaxable too.
A big part of the problem is that any change to the UI inevitably causes a lot of complaining - often times not really justified because it's simply a matter of people getting used to the new.
Unfortunately these "hipsters" (as you call them) extrapolate this to the assumption that *all* complaints about a new UI are unjustified and would go away if users would just take the time to become accustomed to it.
This and (as others have pointed out) the inexplicable compulsion they feel to "tabletize" every UI.
i doubt it is bribing and you are probably just using the wrong word
The correct euphemism today is "making political donations".
bribing is illegal
Not if it's done in the form of a political donation.
I am more bored than you could ever possibly be. Go back to work.