Open and friendly competition is gaining traction
Google's product is Andriod users. Google's customers are it's advertisers. Andriod is gaining traction because it's given away free. There should be no surprise there. The big question really is how on earth do Apple get to charge more money for similar hardware and functionality and still not be able to manufacture enough devices to meet demand. I used to run FreeBSD with a KDE desktop for years and are was a big advocate of open source because I hated the virus and trogans the where fcuking up windoze computers. The problem now is the unfriendly scammers who are spreading malware on free software on Andriod app stores. Getting crap on my computer was my I dropped windoze and all the unfriendly malware getting into Andriod is a reason I can't consider something like the new Samsung Galaxy Andriod devices. Andriod is the new windoze when it comes to security and malware issues. Sorry to say by that walled garden without the malware is looking very good.
Patents are supposed to be there to protect the inventor of a new idea, to allow them to market and make money off their new invention. Making an existing idea/product neater, giving it a pleasing case/housing and rounded corners should not be a patentable market distinction.
You are mistaking "Design Patents" vs good old regular patents. Design Patents are more like copyright but for industrial design so one company can not simply go out and exactly copy their competitors product and create customer confusion in the market. Should it be ok for a Korean or Chinese company to make an 99% copy of a Corvette car and then flood the USA market with it confusing customers if it's a real Corvette or a imported "copy". A Design Patent protects things like the styling of a particular make of car and it's distinctive qualities, like a Corvette looks very distinctive. It doesn't have anything to do with the internal suspension, ABS, traction control or other technical elements of the car that may be covered by other unrelated patents.
During the Australian Apple vs Samsung lawsuit the Judge held up an Samsung Galaxy Tab and an iPad in each hand and asked Samsung's head lawyer which one was made by his client. For a few yards away the Samsung lawyer was unable to correctly identify the Galaxy Tab. That is because Samsung intentionally designed their product to look as close as possible to Apples and create confusion in the market place. Motorola, HTC, Dell, HP, and Research in Motion can make tablets that don't create the same level of confusion amongst customers. Samsung can too make unique and distinctive products if they wanted. But instead they are trying to copy Apples to give them a competitive advantage over the other Andriod manufactures.
"No matter where you go, there you are..." -- Buckaroo Banzai