Comment Re:Correction... (Score 1) 625
> Don't pity me though. Instead, can I have your UID once you accept your 'gift' in all its fulness?
I'm sorry, I take that back.
> Don't pity me though. Instead, can I have your UID once you accept your 'gift' in all its fulness?
I'm sorry, I take that back.
Curse, not gift.
Don't pity me though. Instead, can I have your UID once you accept your 'gift' in all its fulness?
In the off chance, someone misses the sarcasm...
We're obligated to treat them as symbiotes, as we were them ourselves. And, as we (hopefully) move into a more 'parasitical' stage of symbiosis (called "getting old"), we hope these formerly parasitical symbiotes treat us as we treated them.
So an "excellent employee" gave you a perfectly valid notice period, and you call him a douchebag for rejecting an additional request you made... well, take a good close look at yourself.
He's probably much better off where he is now
His points are mostly still valid ( but not his language). The only issue he has is conflating management and developers (to be fair, there is some overlap between upper level develops and management)
Try Exetel Australia: static IP, servers welcome, addons include: reasonable excess traffic fees, VOIP DIDs, SMS API, bidirectional Fax/Email gateway, hosting and more...
I also remember them being profit-limited (perhaps by charter?), but I am not sure of that last bit.
> The poster you replied to is entriely correct in saying "Most patients".
As is the poster you replied to, who did not contradict this.
Well yes, the point is that Oracle is charging an AMC for the equivalent of the customer losing their install CDs. Nothing illegal, but stuff to be aware of.
Also nothing like the iOS comparison you made
No, this is simply about oracle charging an AMC because the customer did the equivalent of losing the installation CDs
> (Without such a keyboard, I agree with you.)
So you agree with him 99% !
And then a thousand other Facebook work-alikes will spring up, all with your information
But at least two other moderators don't agree with me..
Didn't work -- its still a bad joke.
But it was just following SMTP's lead...
Remember one of the reasons (I'm sure there were others) SMTP won over X.400 was developers could telnet to port 25 and do their thing...
Until the day a new 'Protocol-aware telnet 2.0' translates user-entered commands to binary protocols on-the-fly, a binary HTTP 2.0 is a bad idea.
You will have many recoverable tape errors.